Now, THIS is how you run an election.
Sep. 5th, 2008 08:41 pmOn Sunday, the Interim Placeholder Prime Minister of Canada will be calling an election.
On October 14th, Canada will vote. On paper. Counted by hand. And we'll know who won by the morning of the 15th. AND we'll have a paper record so we can recount, reliably, any time we want.
Total elapsed time from announcing the election and starting campaigning, to knowing the results: *38 days*.
I'm just sayin'.
On October 14th, Canada will vote. On paper. Counted by hand. And we'll know who won by the morning of the 15th. AND we'll have a paper record so we can recount, reliably, any time we want.
Total elapsed time from announcing the election and starting campaigning, to knowing the results: *38 days*.
I'm just sayin'.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 12:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 01:05 am (UTC)They're wrong, of course, because they weren't elected on the groundswell of "conservative" fuckwittery. They were elected on the grounds that they were less damaging than the NDP and Canada's *real* government needed to be punished for a few years.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 12:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 01:03 am (UTC)Population of US: 305,071,453 (http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html)
I'm not saying it's not feasible for the US to go back to paper voting, but it wouldn't be so easy for the US to do so.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 01:07 am (UTC)(And significantly cheaper than the voting machines, even if the voting machines weren't insecure, unsafe, untrustworthy, and built by partisan Republicans.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 01:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 02:07 pm (UTC)You just get a bunch of people in a hall with a bunch of observers and they count in a systematised way until they're done, and the observers (party volunteers) report any queries to the returning officer.
Scales to as big a population as you like. Out population is about a 5th the US, India's population is 4 times the US, works just as well in both.
Of course, the superiority of a Parliamentary system in terms of stability and good governance, as well as much cheaper elections, are also part of John's point, but getting movement there would take much longer, directly elected executive offices got idealised by people who'd never seen it in action before and 300 years later you still haven't worked out the flaws.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 09:58 pm (UTC)(Coming from Aus, where voting is compulsory, I still have trouble wrapping my head around some of the voting issues in America)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 01:31 am (UTC)After choosing my candidate on the screen, I got a paper print-out to approve. It was then deposited into the traditional ballot box should the votes need to be verified later.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 01:40 am (UTC)A) There are no witnesses, by definition, to an electronically tabulated ballot counting
B) the person challenging the result usually pays for the recount
C) The cheating can present but not immediately blatant (see also: the 10% change in totals in favour of Bush, in 2004, on *all* non-verified voting machines over exit polls versus the 0% change, in 2004, on all paper voting districts)
Meaning that, even *in* the *rare* case of paper backups to electronic voting machines, it's difficult to catch cheating and expensive to challenge it.
(PS: In every case of paper ballots or electronic machines with paper backups, the votes matched the exit polls. Exactly. In every case of electronic voting machines without paper backups, the results were 5-15% off versus exit polls, in favour of Bush every single time, and there were multiple incidents of "accidental" 1000% voting in favour of Bush, or of counties with 99% turnout (in favour of Bush) where the regional and national average both stuck around one third of that.
The electronic machines *cannot be trusted*. The ones with paper backups are better, and weren't obviously cheated in 2004, but they're still untrustworthy *and* cannot be adequately and safely vetted.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 02:44 am (UTC)Jesus, just get 'em all in a supermarket parking lot and do a show of hands!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 04:39 am (UTC)30 Helens agree
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 06:39 pm (UTC)HOWEVER.. almost all of us live within 200 km of the border. We have more land than you but... dude. It's FREEZING north of that point. The USA has a more preferable climate for our species over their whole country.
Just sayin.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 03:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 05:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 05:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 06:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 06:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 01:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 08:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 12:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 01:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 02:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 02:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-06 06:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-07 12:27 am (UTC)But said government is desperately hoping to re-entrench itself before politics to their South have an echoing effect in the North. A slam bang election that favors the people best positioned for media saturation and high-end power games pretty much means any kind of grassroots movement is boned.
...except for the Quebec Seperatists...cause those guys ar elike on PERMANENT "Go" mode.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-07 05:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-27 11:41 am (UTC)On the other hand, ours (in Britain) take longer than that. Can you guys invade and conquer us, please?