So, the new Metallica sucks.
Sep. 10th, 2008 06:54 pmYes, I know, you've all been waiting for my opinion with bated breath. No longer!
This album sucks. It's not as bad as St Anger, but that statement really means nothing. Nickelback isn't as bad as St Anger, and they're still the worst band in existence[1].
The entire album sounds like Ride The Lightning, if you removed all the melodies and put everyone but the bassist[2] through the St Anger high-pass filter that makes everything sound like it's being played on tiny speakers from a transitor radio while Mike Tyson is standing on James Hetfield's testicles and singing joyously along. So, basically, it's St Anger, but using Ride The Lightning instead of Re-Load as the base to work from.
Two exceptions: Suicide & Redemption is a melodic instrumental where they only ruined the sounds of the drums and not the rest of the band, and it actually sounds good enough that I haven't immediately relegated it to the trashbin.
The Unforgiven III is a light-rock ballad, along the lines of (unsurprisingly) The Unforgiven and The Unforgiven II. It's got a melody and the guitars and strings sound good, unlike the rest of the album, but Mike Tyson is still standing on Hetfield's nuts and making sweet harmonies. However, again unlike the rest of the album, it's not *completely* bad! This is good, because I really liked the first two[3].
Seriously. They need to *fire* whoever's doing the mixing, because this is now two albums in a row with *no low end*. No bass! Everything sounds tinny and crappy! And the tracks that *don't* have it clearly show that it's a *deliberate choice*.
So yeah.
Do not buy this piece of shit. Listen to Suicide & Redemption and buy just that track. Listen to The Unforgiven III and *maybe* buy just that track. You *could* listen to the rest of the album, but there's no point - you already heard it all in 2003 with St Anger.
[1]: A ranking calculated very scientifically. There's a formula. It starts with how lousy you are, then multiplies by how many albums you have and how often I've been forced to change the radio station to avoid you or one of your soundalikes.
[2]: No, really. I wonder if "don't fuck up my sound" was a condition in Rob Trujillo's contract when they hired him.
[3]: How many other songs have sequels? White Zombie has Electric Head Part 1: The Agony and Electric Head Part 2: The Ecstasy, but they were both on the same album[4].
[4]: "Astro Creep 2000: Songs Of Love, Destruction, And Other Synthetic Delusions Of The Electric Head." - which is still the coolest album name of all time.
This album sucks. It's not as bad as St Anger, but that statement really means nothing. Nickelback isn't as bad as St Anger, and they're still the worst band in existence[1].
The entire album sounds like Ride The Lightning, if you removed all the melodies and put everyone but the bassist[2] through the St Anger high-pass filter that makes everything sound like it's being played on tiny speakers from a transitor radio while Mike Tyson is standing on James Hetfield's testicles and singing joyously along. So, basically, it's St Anger, but using Ride The Lightning instead of Re-Load as the base to work from.
Two exceptions: Suicide & Redemption is a melodic instrumental where they only ruined the sounds of the drums and not the rest of the band, and it actually sounds good enough that I haven't immediately relegated it to the trashbin.
The Unforgiven III is a light-rock ballad, along the lines of (unsurprisingly) The Unforgiven and The Unforgiven II. It's got a melody and the guitars and strings sound good, unlike the rest of the album, but Mike Tyson is still standing on Hetfield's nuts and making sweet harmonies. However, again unlike the rest of the album, it's not *completely* bad! This is good, because I really liked the first two[3].
Seriously. They need to *fire* whoever's doing the mixing, because this is now two albums in a row with *no low end*. No bass! Everything sounds tinny and crappy! And the tracks that *don't* have it clearly show that it's a *deliberate choice*.
So yeah.
Do not buy this piece of shit. Listen to Suicide & Redemption and buy just that track. Listen to The Unforgiven III and *maybe* buy just that track. You *could* listen to the rest of the album, but there's no point - you already heard it all in 2003 with St Anger.
[1]: A ranking calculated very scientifically. There's a formula. It starts with how lousy you are, then multiplies by how many albums you have and how often I've been forced to change the radio station to avoid you or one of your soundalikes.
[2]: No, really. I wonder if "don't fuck up my sound" was a condition in Rob Trujillo's contract when they hired him.
[3]: How many other songs have sequels? White Zombie has Electric Head Part 1: The Agony and Electric Head Part 2: The Ecstasy, but they were both on the same album[4].
[4]: "Astro Creep 2000: Songs Of Love, Destruction, And Other Synthetic Delusions Of The Electric Head." - which is still the coolest album name of all time.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:12 pm (UTC)More than you'd think. My favorite is probably "Magic Melody Part 2," not because I've ever heard it...but what comes to mind include:
"Another Brick In The Wall," which has parts 1, 2, and 3; "Shine On You Crazy Diamond," divided into Parts I-V and VI-IX; Pink Floyd.
"Joe's Garage," parts 1, 2, and 3; Frank Zappa.
"Karn Evil 9," which is really one piece in several parts; Emerson, Lake, and Palmer.
An interesting example, which is probably the most literal "sequel," is called "March Of The Undead," by Masugn, with two sequels by Machinae Supremacy.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 12:31 am (UTC)That's not sequels, that's just huge songs that have been split up.
Iron Maiden made sequels to a couple of songs - the "Charlotte the Harlot" begat the bad "22 Acacia Avenue", and "The Prisoner" begat "Back in the Village". Both sequels being horrendously bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 12:39 am (UTC)Debatable. (Or, "a matter of fact for the jury to determine." You know how they say law school eats your life? Yeah.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 01:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 01:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 11:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 10:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:12 pm (UTC)For the record, worms are not tasty.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-10 11:29 pm (UTC)Metallica aren't so much a band as a soap opera. The new record is just a notable episode which is enjoyable at the time.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 12:22 am (UTC)Death Magnetic seems to have taken every other album recorded previously and made a kind of homage album, with a sound that's notably different than everything at the same time. I hear elements of all the albums in there, and I like it. They're evolving -- and no, it's not perfect -- I actually critique it with a lot of the same points that you made -- but I don't dislike what they've done.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 12:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 06:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 12:45 am (UTC)I had Hopes of the new Metallica album. I shall pretend I have not read this and give it a try.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 02:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 06:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 12:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-11 02:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-13 04:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 06:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-24 06:36 pm (UTC)(And their best was still the black album. Dammit. But that's because I have no patience for bands without melody, and the farther you go back in their catalogue, the less they knew how to play and the more they were just thrashing and screaming as much as possible. Booo-ring. If I wanted to listen to incompetents, I'd listen to punk, and shoot myself.)