normanrafferty pointed me to your journal (the entry with the bahrs climbing up the ladder). I poked about a little. You have nifty stuff. If it's any use to you, I'm Ursula on FM.
Yes, but I believe this is the first to be "seen" directly. Most planets are detected by small shifts of light and movement in the stars they are orbiting, and those planets are, like this one, massive enough to cause such disturbances. I do not believe we have yet discovered an extrasolar planet similar in mass to ours, not that they aren't out there, but the reflective light and mass is too small for us to detect.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 06:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 06:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 06:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 07:47 pm (UTC)http://www.livephysics.com/images/stories/simulations/astronomy/solar_systems03.jpg
6 jupiters is actually a decent size, even compared to the sun.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 08:34 pm (UTC)That's pretty dense. You could crack a tooth on that!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 12:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 10:29 pm (UTC)Like how Stonehenge is smaller when draw on a cocktail napkin, y'know?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 04:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 07:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 10:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 10:16 pm (UTC)For the amusement factor though, check the tags the customers have added to the book. As well as the mouthful that is the "buy together" link...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-15 10:58 pm (UTC)http://www.fresnobee.com/384/story/849202.html
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 05:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 06:04 am (UTC)Yet.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 05:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-16 12:41 pm (UTC)