I wouldn't trust a standard cargo vessel deck to fire a MBT primary cannon from. I have this nightmare vision of a T-72 going through the deck and out the bottom.
The vessel should be fine. Packaging and placement here are of utmost importance.
I've only hauled one load that threatened to capsize me, and none that threatened to go through the hull. As long as the loaders spread the weight, tanks are just as safe to haul as other bits of heavy equipment.
Through the hull is one thing. I'm thinking, through the top deck while motoring back and forth in a 41 tonne vehicle and firing a 125mm cannon that, quote unquote, "is certified strong enough to ram the tank through forty centimetres of iron-reinforced brick wall, though doing so will negatively affect the gun's accuracy when subsequently fired" is another.
I don't know much about cargo ships compared to an actual sailor. But, really, if the recoil can put the tank through half a meter of iron-reinforced brick, I'm willing to believe it might be bad for a ship's top deck.
The gas engine breaking point comes from mechanics I know and others who work on engines. The peak power (automotive) vs. continuous power (electric) ratings are always pointed out by experienced electric car conversion nuts to newbies planning their own conversions.
I'm aware it's a brake horsepower rating. The difference between continuous and redline operation, though, is significant. Or so I've been told by those who know.
I'm aware it's a brake horsepower rating. The difference between continuous and redline operation, though, is significant. Or so I've been told by those who know.
That depends. In a racing engine it's significant because you'll be going flat out, in normal road use it's more or less irrelevant because you won't.
I understand why this is done, but many don't, so when they see the horsepower ratings of electric motors being installed in cars they get this puzzled "why bother with so little power?" look on their faces. Then one has to explain the whole continuous/peak rating distinctions. Again.
I know people who push their electrics to three or four times the motor ratings in electric car drags. They mostly let them cool afterwards. If they don't, they let the smoke out. I've seen some pretty cool motor fireball videos.
There are many things a T-72 is good at. Hunting down speedboats armed with assault rifles and grenade launchers from the pitching and rolling deck of a cargo ship isn't one of them.
Who cares? Seriously. They can't do anything with them. They don't know how to use them and can't get them off the ship. The AK47s and RPG7s that were in the box are far more of a concern than Soviet Era MBTs.
Besides, this maybe the single best thing that could have happened. The pirates who have been operating freely and terrorizing the Somali coast has now actually done something that will make the world deal with them instead of pretending they don't exist.
See, this is what I was thinking. If I'm the pirate captain of the vessel capturing this ship, I'm like "Sorry guys, my bad" and leaving it for other prey that won't bring a major world power down on my ass.
Yup. Even if they did know how to use them, they would never get the spare parts necessary to maintain them. Tanks and other armoured vehicles are very, very maintenance intensive.
The ship's got entire containers of spare everythings for those tanks, actually.
They were being sold to the Kenyan government, with the idea being that this ship was going to have absolutely everything they'd need for months of operation.
And if that means they need to hire some Russian Army types to teach them how to run that tanks, that's still entirely different from "they have no spares".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 06:35 pm (UTC)I've only hauled one load that threatened to capsize me, and none that threatened to go through the hull. As long as the loaders spread the weight, tanks are just as safe to haul as other bits of heavy equipment.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 10:44 pm (UTC)I don't know much about cargo ships compared to an actual sailor. But, really, if the recoil can put the tank through half a meter of iron-reinforced brick, I'm willing to believe it might be bad for a ship's top deck.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 06:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 08:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 08:42 pm (UTC)And where did you get the bit about having to break the engine? It's brake horsepower.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-29 04:52 pm (UTC)I'm aware it's a brake horsepower rating. The difference between continuous and redline operation, though, is significant. Or so I've been told by those who know.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-29 05:35 pm (UTC)That depends. In a racing engine it's significant because you'll be going flat out, in normal road use it's more or less irrelevant because you won't.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-30 01:19 am (UTC)I know people who push their electrics to three or four times the motor ratings in electric car drags. They mostly let them cool afterwards. If they don't, they let the smoke out. I've seen some pretty cool motor fireball videos.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-30 11:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 05:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 02:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 03:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 04:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 03:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 06:47 am (UTC)Besides, this maybe the single best thing that could have happened. The pirates who have been operating freely and terrorizing the Somali coast has now actually done something that will make the world deal with them instead of pretending they don't exist.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 07:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 01:11 pm (UTC)The holy shit moment is for the pirates, who took the ship, then looked at the manifest and said "bugger".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 02:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 02:29 pm (UTC)They were being sold to the Kenyan government, with the idea being that this ship was going to have absolutely everything they'd need for months of operation.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 08:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 10:38 pm (UTC)I was just saying "plenty of spare parts".
And if that means they need to hire some Russian Army types to teach them how to run that tanks, that's still entirely different from "they have no spares".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 02:01 pm (UTC)tpload of Russian tanks was headed along the Somali coast.(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 02:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 02:12 pm (UTC)"Hey, kenya spare a few armored vehicles? Tanks a lot!"
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-28 06:36 pm (UTC)