For the fans of British TV.
Oct. 13th, 2008 07:09 pmDo you recognise this man?

You should. This is Paterson Joseph, a quite excellent actor whose past roles include the Marquis of Carabas in Gaiman's "Neverwhere", and several Doctor Who episodes.
Well, rumour has it he's got a new role on the show: the eleventh Doctor.
Source's previous rumours on Who have been good. Maybe this one is, too.

You should. This is Paterson Joseph, a quite excellent actor whose past roles include the Marquis of Carabas in Gaiman's "Neverwhere", and several Doctor Who episodes.
Well, rumour has it he's got a new role on the show: the eleventh Doctor.
Source's previous rumours on Who have been good. Maybe this one is, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-13 11:11 pm (UTC)Much as I've been hoping for Miranda Richardson, I GUESS I could cope. Yow.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-13 11:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 01:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-13 11:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 01:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 03:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 05:32 am (UTC)And when your plot unfortunately hinges on multiple action sequences, that's a very serious problem.
But I remember the Marquis, and I remember him as being not part of the crap.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-15 06:34 pm (UTC)De Carabas was damn good in it though, and the basic idea was obviously strong (hence me rereading the novel every few years and hoping the movie does happen, even if the movie'd have to cut far too much out).
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 04:41 am (UTC)SheriffDoctor?Hey, it worked in Blazing Saddles...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 05:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 07:15 am (UTC)But I felt it was a almost 50% appropriate statement.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 06:33 pm (UTC)I liked "Neverwhere" (a story that was practicly unfilmable, so give the Beeb a break...it was probably made for peanuts. Possibly literally.)
The book and comic are better though.
If this IS true then he seems as good a choice as any.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-14 06:41 pm (UTC)Joseph is being rumoured for *2011*.
And no, they don't need to address the number of regenerations, because there has never been a number established since the reboot. They've wiped out everything else inconvenient, much of it simply by not mentioning it, so why not that, too?
(Of course, they've also made "regeneration!" the solution and major plot element to almost everything, but we're not going to talk about that.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-15 06:37 pm (UTC)That device no longer exists, thus there is no artificial limiter. They've already brought the Master back despite him having used up all his, using some "the Time Lords did it" PSB, so there's no issue.
McGann, OTOH, is now canon, his face was in that notebook in Human Nature alongside a bunch of other incarnations.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-19 12:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-19 01:08 am (UTC)#2: Because she was supposed to *die*, and her being alive at all was an afterthought.
#3: Because the implication is that regeneration is a conscious effort and the Time Lords need to know what they're doing to do it right.
#4: Because what regenerated her wasn't Time Lord Regeneration, it was a side effect of the GECK.
#5: Because Russell T Davies really doesn't think before he writes. Or during. Or after. He is, frankly, an idiot who thinks regeneration is not just the coolest thing but the *only* thing worth hanging a story on.
Back dortorz
Date: 2008-10-17 04:53 pm (UTC)