(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-23 11:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] athelind.livejournal.com
The last Windows computer in the house died a week and a half ago.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-23 11:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sanityimpaired.livejournal.com
Personally, I'd rather they not tell me what the gaping security hole is other than to state that it's not there anymore. Code Red, Sasser, and Slammer should have taught us all that patch notes about security patches are dangerous things.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 11:52 am (UTC)
jerril: A cartoon head with caucasian skin, brown hair, and glasses. (Default)
From: [personal profile] jerril
On the other hand, if nobody knows what it was, there's no way anyone can verify that the issue was really fixed and that a new bug wasn't introduced.

Security through obscurity doesn't work well.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 11:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
*They* know what it is. They just don't want to make it public twelve hours before a patch., because without a patch, that's 12 hours of every computer on the internet being vulnerable to executing arbitrary code.

They gave out details on *where* the hole was about 4 hours before the patch, and in the patch itself. In about a week, they'll release example code to exploit it on unpatched systems.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sanityimpaired.livejournal.com
Even after the fact, there are people who have ignored all the wonderful automatic update information and are now suddenly at huge risk because the details of the vulnerability are now available. Thus my reference to the most prolific and damaging virii we've ever seen, all of which were written based on security patch notes after the patch was released.

And I forgot blaster in the list. *facepalm*

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] city-of-dis.livejournal.com
Yeah, it restarted my machine without asking me and I lost some work. Goddamn it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 02:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Set your system to download and notify but not apply, then.

And also: Save your work every time you stand up!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] city-of-dis.livejournal.com
Oh, fuck you Preachy McPreacherkins. I know I should have done that, but sometimes a boy forgets. Or falls over from all the narcotics and can't hit "save."

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
The first tip means that it can never happen again.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] city-of-dis.livejournal.com
Yes, I know that, but I'm also retarded when it comes to computers, so I'll have to ask my man to do it when he returns from his trip.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-24 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
XP or Vista?

In XP, click Start -> Control Panel
(Or Start -> Settings -> Control Panel, if you're using the older-model start menu.)

Click Automatic Updates.

There's a radio button with four options: Automatic (recommended) is ticked.

The next option down is the one to download and notify you but not install anything without permission.

That's the one you want. Select it and click OK.

You're done.

(Vista is very similar, but I don't think it's exactly the same process)

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 01:23 pm