(no subject)
Nov. 28th, 2008 06:28 pmIn Kentucky, the primary mission of the State Department Of Homeland Security is *religious* in nature - specifically, it's "initial duty" is "stressing the dependence on Almighty God as being vital to the security of the Commonwealth."
Homeland Security is also ordered to "publicise God's benevolent protection in its reports, and it must post a plaque at the entrance to the state Emergency Operations Center with an 88-word statement that begins, 'The safety and security of the Commonwealth cannot be achieved apart from reliance upon Almighty God.'"
Homeland Security is also ordered to "publicise God's benevolent protection in its reports, and it must post a plaque at the entrance to the state Emergency Operations Center with an 88-word statement that begins, 'The safety and security of the Commonwealth cannot be achieved apart from reliance upon Almighty God.'"
(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-28 11:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 04:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-30 01:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-28 11:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-28 11:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 01:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 04:14 am (UTC)It's a code word for white supremacists.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 01:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-30 01:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-28 11:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 03:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 08:20 pm (UTC)It certainly is not the policy of the Federal Department of Homeland Security.
I work for the DHS, I think I'd know if there was such a policy. And there isn't. If Kentucky has passed that law, then the State's government is fucked up.
But how many people really pay attention to what's going on in their State government? Can you name your local representatives? What their party affiliations are? What their political leanings are?
I didn't think so.
All politics is local.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 08:50 pm (UTC)It is.
which I doubt,
Take it up with the Lexington Herald-Leader.
please note that it is Kentucky's STATE Department of Homeland Security.
As I did, in the headline, as everyone else in the comments has, and as the article is quite clear on.
Who are you trying to argue with on that point, again?
I work for the DHS, I think I'd know if there was such a policy.
I think you wouldn't know about it, given that the policy exists and *you didn't know about it*.
And there isn't.
What part of the article is at all unclear?
Can you name your local representatives? What their party affiliations are? What their political leanings are?
Brigadier General Gordon O'Connor (ret), Conservative Party, somewhere to the right of Attila The Hun, will give blowjobs in exchange for donations. Never met a moneymaking scam he didn't love, and his approval rating drops to ~8% among people who ever dealt with him as a serving officer.
I didn't think so.
Gee, thanks for the vote of confidence.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 09:35 pm (UTC)I did not get the impression that most of the people replying to your post had paid the least bit of attention to the fact that it is the *State's* policy.
Sure, you'll probably say that my impression was wrong. But that's what formed the basis for my post. I know that when people hear/read "Department of Homeland Security," they automatically think of the Federal agency.
Do states even have "Departments of Homeland Security?" Some kind of State security, yes. Homeland? DHS was formed after 9/11 and is a conglomeration of several separate agencies. Most states don't have their own unified system of defense, that's why the U.S. DHS was created.
I just want to make it clear that, while the U.S. DHS is far from perfect, this particular bit of astonishing ignorance is not one of its faults.
Take that as you will. I'm not generally an apologist for the DHS, but I take enough pride in my work that I don't want to see my employers unduly slandered. ("Unduly" being a key word, here.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 09:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-30 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-11-29 10:28 pm (UTC)