Comic Book Geek Brain: "Well, duh. Superman and The Flash have been doing that for 50 years or more."
Environmental Scientist Brain: "Clever idea, but what will the long-term effects on weather and climate be? Hurricanes are a major part of the atmospheric heat engine that shunt heat from the equator to the poles; all that heat won't just go away..."
I suspect that they'll only use it on hurricanes that are going to hit inhabited areas, that they'll only use it to *reduce* the power of hurricanes down to tropical storms, and that we'll get more hurricanes overall - meaning, more for them to stop *and* more that are allowed to go happily on their way because they're out to sea.
But that's my simplistic estimate. I hear there are people who make models of this for a living.
I'm not up on my atmospheric science, but if you're using something like an F-4, which has a service ceiling of 57,800 feet, getting above the storm to drop into the eye shouldn't be a problem.
It doesn't seem much crazy to me. You'd never have to buy another beer in your life if you destroy a hurricane that's about to hit land. You're either dead or you're the King of Florida.
Are there any calculations yet? I didn't see any in the article or attached patent application. I have a VERY hard time accepting the miniscule atmospheric disruption caused by the jets' sonic booms is going to even make a hurricane hiccup.
University of Akron?! Seriously?! Ohio and how to stop a hurricane? /head desk
OHIO!
Date: 2008-12-02 04:47 pm (UTC)Especially in OHIO, where ev'ryone's insane ...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:06 pm (UTC)Comic Book Geek Brain: "Well, duh. Superman and The Flash have been doing that for 50 years or more."
Environmental Scientist Brain: "Clever idea, but what will the long-term effects on weather and climate be? Hurricanes are a major part of the atmospheric heat engine that shunt heat from the equator to the poles; all that heat won't just go away..."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:12 pm (UTC)I smell a disaster movie brewing.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:22 pm (UTC)But that's my simplistic estimate. I hear there are people who make models of this for a living.
They'll pay for it out of a military budget
Date: 2008-12-02 05:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:25 pm (UTC)Hitting the eyewall would suck, though, and getting *in* might be difficult unless the plane can go over the top of the clouds.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:51 pm (UTC)"We're looking for a few dumb motherfuckers... err, good men, to fly over and then inside a hurricane, do laps inside the eye at Mach 1.5, etc. etc."
I mean, sure, nifty if it works. But you hit that eyewall, and it's goodbye airman.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 06:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 07:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 06:13 pm (UTC)You have to realize pilots of combat aircraft are all crazy to some extent already.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 06:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-03 01:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 05:32 pm (UTC)University of Akron?! Seriously?! Ohio and how to stop a hurricane? /head desk
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 06:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 07:47 pm (UTC)and what they conveniently leave out is that the energy in a sonic boom drops in intensity as the cube root of distance from origin point.
With a 40-60 km diameter for the eye ... I'm not seeing this as effective. Tornados, maybe. Hurricanes ... no.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-04 04:46 pm (UTC)