(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unnamed525.livejournal.com
Why do you hate freedom, the freedom to call it "football"?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Also, pads are wussy.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kierthos.livejournal.com
Can you even tackle people in soccer?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
I don't think so, but they do anyway. I was thinking more of rugby, anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Okay, whatever you've done to your name is kinda neat. As soon as the email comment notifications try to parse your name, they send *the entire rest of the message* backwards.

And, really interestingly, "view source" on your name from your journal page *does the same thing to the code*.

How'd you do that?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
An invisible backwards encoding character, that I thought would just make the name line backwards like everyone else. Try copying my name line to Notepad, you should get an undisplayable character box, that's what it is.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
And there it is.

Holy CRAP, that's annoying in the email comments.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Hard to tell - there's an unmatched "backwards" character in the previous email chain so the entire header set is printing backwards, but the comment itself did come out the right way!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
It does appear to be. The "Felt like a bulldozer trying to catch a butterfly (lafinjack) replied to
a comment you left in your LiveJournal post
(http://theweaselking.livejournal.com/3200530.html). The comment they
replied to was:" part is reversed, but the actual comment itself is right way around.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Yeah, I just meant to screw around a little bit, not the whole email doodad.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pope-guilty.livejournal.com
Please respond to this comment, as I wish to see the magic.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 08:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com
I can't believe you didn't know about the unicode reversing character.

I've posted about it a few times.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
Yes. The game differs in that the aim is not to kill the other player, but merely to get the ball.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 08:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
Can you? No. Do you? yes.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-13 02:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com
Yes! Okay, not the way you're thinking, but there is an action referred to as tackling, and it feels really satisfying when you do it right (as does executing a good tackle in American Football). Some of my most vivid memories from when I played soccer are of sliding tackles. (I was a fullback.)

Again, even though it's not the same kind of tackle as you're picturing, it shares the traits of being kinda dramatic, feeling really satisfying to accomplish, and often knocking somebody down. (The big difference, is that you're not hitting the other person directly; you're stopping the ball they're dribbling, in such a way that they trip over the ball leaving you in possession of it.)

Ah good times, good times. I miss playing soccer.

I really love both sports, but I can't watch soccer as covered by American camera crews. Ugh. American commentators using a a video feed from some foreign network, okay.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jokemanandpeppy.livejournal.com
*sits back and waits for the discussion that it's not an egg but a prolate spheroid*

*is also ashamed to know that*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
And also the arrow labelled "hand" is actually pointing at an "elbow".

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jokemanandpeppy.livejournal.com
Sometimes, you can't be too sure.

http://anncoulter.org/cgi-local/photo.cgi?image=silver-dress.jpg

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elffin.livejournal.com
Australian Rules: bareknuckle mob fighting in a ring with an egg.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-13 08:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prk.livejournal.com
What rules?

prk.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-13 12:18 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
I only found out recently that Aussie rules football is based on the first Football club's rules, and they're from Sheffield.

All of a sudden, the whole game makes sense. Not the rules, obviously, few things from Sheffield make sense.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Don't ^^^^ Care ^^^^

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 09:24 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 10:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenandtheart.livejournal.com
Brilliant! Now I would like something similar with Aussie Rules.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-12 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paoconnell.livejournal.com
Aussie Rules football, US and Canadian football, and Rugby all deserve the name "football."

Soccer doesn't.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-13 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
That's just not true though! At least with Soccer, you are using your FEET to play BALL. In the above, it's only used for punting and the extra score!

Sorry, but gotta disagree

Date: 2009-01-14 04:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paoconnell.livejournal.com
Soccer is truly boring--final scores of 1 to 0 are not uncommon.

I prefer the other versions simply because they're more fun to play (American football when I was young) and to watch now.

Re: Boring?

Date: 2009-01-14 11:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harper-knight.livejournal.com
Tell that to the British football fans, who happily riot over a win as easily as a loss. You ever go to one of those games, you will be excited, whether you care about the game or not. It's just a feeling.

Re: Boring?

Date: 2009-01-14 05:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paoconnell.livejournal.com
Sounds like I'll never attend a British soccer game, which is apparently just an excuse to fight during or afterwards. I've heard it's even worse in some other countries. At least fighting in the stands in US (and presumably Canadian) football is rare.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-13 02:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sparkindarkness.livejournal.com
It's rugby! Only with a lot more body armour and stopping for a rest every 10 minutes

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-13 05:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
It's hard work.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-14 04:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paoconnell.livejournal.com
Well, American/Canadian football are descended from rugby. The set plays change the nature of the game of course.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 06:49 pm