(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seriesfinale.livejournal.com
That's just tempting the fates.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silmaril.livejournal.com
I started to recognize a pattern at around #4, and it was verified by the rest.

Anyone else notice that?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silmaril.livejournal.com
Ding ding ding! "Privately owned." "Employee-owned." I don't want to generalize, but there's... something.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dolston.livejournal.com
Not surprising given that traded companies must do things in the best short term interest of the shareholders and not the best interests of its employees.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rimrunner.livejournal.com
The irony there is that the best investments are frequently the ones that DO do things in the best interests of their employees. Articles on picking stocks based on this principle are a regular feature in personal finance advice literature, but for some reason it doesn't seem to catch on. Maybe because figuring out which companies those are requires actual research.

Stock market investing really is a prisoner's dilemma in a lot of ways...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 07:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
I didn't stop to read your icon until just now. Awesome in so many, many ways.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-31 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamshade.livejournal.com
You'll notice that not many people follow the Warren Buffett model of buying and trading stock, either.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadath.livejournal.com
In the US, the boards of publicly-traded companies are legally required to be short-sighted immoral bastards or the shareholders can sue to have them removed, and for damages, I think.

It was in a college ethics course, reading a Milton Friedman essay justifying this principle (it's called "fiduciary responsibility"), that I got radicalized. Which is why I always laugh like a hyena when some free-market-worshiper insists that I read Friedman and I will suddenly understand why laissez-faire capitalism is The One True Economy.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jagash.livejournal.com
Agreed. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harald387.livejournal.com
It's also telling that a third of them are grocery chains.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rimrunner.livejournal.com
Folks gotta eat.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Another third are energy companies.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 07:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sanityimpaired.livejournal.com
Devon Energy went public in 1988, but I agree with the pattern. Not having stockholders dictating that you lay people off during rough times tends to lead to fewer layoffs.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-01-30 08:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
Other patterns I saw: careful money management, respect the employees, listen to the employees.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 03:03 pm