theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
Putting a 500MB file, which is a FREE DOWNLOAD, behind a gateway where you have to log in to reach it, your login session expires after two hours *and it cuts off the download mid-stream*, and download speed is limited to 80k/s.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ironphoenix.livejournal.com
Either that, or the definition of devious. Depends on the intent.

ETA: Actually, the definition of stupid would be going back and restarting the download repeatedly, because maybe it'll work this time!
Edited Date: 2009-05-15 04:11 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 04:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Well, it took until the second try to figure out that it wasn't a random download failure the first time.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skiriki.livejournal.com
Please tell me that at least "resume download" option was allowed? Pwease? Pwetty pwease?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 06:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Not unless you have a third-party download manager that the gateway can't see.

Yeah. It's exactly that dumb.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skiriki.livejournal.com
Oh god the stupid, it BURNS!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I don't. I hate those things.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silmaril.livejournal.com
Classification approved; placed in the "didn't think this through" subcategory of Stupid.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kafziel.livejournal.com
... wait, shouldn't that be enough to download the file?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
In theory, maybe.

If it were exactly 500MB and you consistently got the maximum speed AND it was exactly two hours before the session times out, yes.

But it's not, you don't, and it's not.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
80 kilobits/sec = 10 kilobytes/sec; times 7,200 sec/2 hr = 72,000 kilobytes. Even assuming a thousand KB and not 1024 to the meg, that's nowhere near enough.

And that's at a consistent top speed.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 05:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kafziel.livejournal.com
Except that an 80k/s download speed will pretty much universally mean kilobytes.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I did mean kiloBYTES a second, meaning 500,000 KB at 80KB/s will take 104 minutes.

But it's not 500,000 KB, you don't get 80 consistently, and it's not actually two hours.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 05:38 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 06:17 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zastrazzi.livejournal.com
Heh. Break out the beers, it's time to sail the fail whale!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-15 10:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xenogram.livejournal.com
Now, in the computer age, we can fuck up millions of times faster than was previously possible.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-16 01:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
wget = standard HTTP access. That is, unfortunately, the problem.

I got it, by cheating. But no.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 8th, 2026 09:10 am