The rings of saturn are supposed to be, basically, a lot of empty vacuume and some sparkly, but essentially sparse dust. You don't leave a wake in that, you just basically sweep a little section clear.
The other possibility is that the object there is relatively large and the dark strips is merely a shadow. The lower bright line being occluded by the dark stripe, but not actually broken by it, may lend some credence to this theory.
Although as I read more, the 2008 theory for the wake is moonlets. I don't know where our host found the picture, so if it's more recen than that, with more recent confusion, then I guess that theory is falling out of style.
Well the elder Gods used to do that, but then some dick invented Katamari Damancy and the Elder Gods decided there was a better, more fun, way of doing things...
The shadow's really long for that, and the object itself getting larger and brighter as it passes through - which implies displacing matter, not just getting closer, on that scale.
He's suggesting that the black line is a shadow cast by a *much closer* object that's blocking sunlight, not that something has passed through the ring.
Which, depending on further observation, is possible! A seriously unlikely coincidence, but worse has happened, before.
Um... that's Saturn's moon Daphnis, isn't it? The 'wake' is caused by it's gravitational pull on the dust particles in the ring. I believe io9 did an article on it last week.
It is likely not a hydrodynamic effect, but scoop and scatter - where the impact scoops up dust, and the subsequent inertial transfer changes the dust's vector (because it is not being struck by a perfectly flat / ninety-degree-to-impact-vector surface) until it eventually slips off "the side" of the impactor.
In short, it likely did punch a clean hole - and what we're seeing as the trail is the dust that got punched doing what it is going to do with the newly-imparted inertia: travel in roughly the same but not precisely the same vector as the impactor.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:11 pm (UTC)I want to understand why this is so awesome. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:30 pm (UTC)That *shouldn't be possible* in the rings of Saturn. They're too diffuse.
Which means, we're most likely wrong about how the rings of Saturn work. Or about how *whatever the fuck hit that* works.
Which is AWESOME, either way.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:41 pm (UTC)We've sent probes out, and spectral analysis is continuing to prove to be pretty reliable, so I'm pretty confident they have the right idea here.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 11:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 11:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 01:04 am (UTC)Oh, wait... Sorry. Knee-jerk reaction and all.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 01:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 03:38 am (UTC)Objects cutting through the rings are not "moons" and that pick shows *spreading* which implies *wave effects*.
Which is HOLY SHIT level stuff. One way or another.
and I look forward to finding out how!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 03:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 03:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 03:48 am (UTC)Which, depending on further observation, is possible! A seriously unlikely coincidence, but worse has happened, before.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 06:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 10:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 01:04 pm (UTC)Footfall -18 months and counting...
Bugger for us looking out over the Indian Ocean...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 01:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:01 pm (UTC)This isn't Daphnis.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:04 pm (UTC)Also: damn my faulty memory of articles read in haste last week at work. DAMN IT!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 12:04 am (UTC)In short, it likely did punch a clean hole - and what we're seeing as the trail is the dust that got punched doing what it is going to do with the newly-imparted inertia: travel in roughly the same but not precisely the same vector as the impactor.