The rings of saturn are supposed to be, basically, a lot of empty vacuume and some sparkly, but essentially sparse dust. You don't leave a wake in that, you just basically sweep a little section clear.
Although as I read more, the 2008 theory for the wake is moonlets. I don't know where our host found the picture, so if it's more recen than that, with more recent confusion, then I guess that theory is falling out of style.
The other possibility is that the object there is relatively large and the dark strips is merely a shadow. The lower bright line being occluded by the dark stripe, but not actually broken by it, may lend some credence to this theory.
He's suggesting that the black line is a shadow cast by a *much closer* object that's blocking sunlight, not that something has passed through the ring.
Which, depending on further observation, is possible! A seriously unlikely coincidence, but worse has happened, before.
The shadow's really long for that, and the object itself getting larger and brighter as it passes through - which implies displacing matter, not just getting closer, on that scale.
Well the elder Gods used to do that, but then some dick invented Katamari Damancy and the Elder Gods decided there was a better, more fun, way of doing things...
Um... that's Saturn's moon Daphnis, isn't it? The 'wake' is caused by it's gravitational pull on the dust particles in the ring. I believe io9 did an article on it last week.
It is likely not a hydrodynamic effect, but scoop and scatter - where the impact scoops up dust, and the subsequent inertial transfer changes the dust's vector (because it is not being struck by a perfectly flat / ninety-degree-to-impact-vector surface) until it eventually slips off "the side" of the impactor.
In short, it likely did punch a clean hole - and what we're seeing as the trail is the dust that got punched doing what it is going to do with the newly-imparted inertia: travel in roughly the same but not precisely the same vector as the impactor.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:11 pm (UTC)I want to understand why this is so awesome. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:41 pm (UTC)We've sent probes out, and spectral analysis is continuing to prove to be pretty reliable, so I'm pretty confident they have the right idea here.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 03:38 am (UTC)Objects cutting through the rings are not "moons" and that pick shows *spreading* which implies *wave effects*.
Which is HOLY SHIT level stuff. One way or another.
and I look forward to finding out how!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:30 pm (UTC)That *shouldn't be possible* in the rings of Saturn. They're too diffuse.
Which means, we're most likely wrong about how the rings of Saturn work. Or about how *whatever the fuck hit that* works.
Which is AWESOME, either way.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 03:48 am (UTC)Which, depending on further observation, is possible! A seriously unlikely coincidence, but worse has happened, before.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 03:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 09:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 01:04 am (UTC)Oh, wait... Sorry. Knee-jerk reaction and all.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 03:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 10:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 10:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 06:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 11:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-09 11:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 01:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 01:04 pm (UTC)Footfall -18 months and counting...
Bugger for us looking out over the Indian Ocean...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 01:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:01 pm (UTC)This isn't Daphnis.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-10 02:04 pm (UTC)Also: damn my faulty memory of articles read in haste last week at work. DAMN IT!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 12:04 am (UTC)In short, it likely did punch a clean hole - and what we're seeing as the trail is the dust that got punched doing what it is going to do with the newly-imparted inertia: travel in roughly the same but not precisely the same vector as the impactor.