Hugos!

Aug. 9th, 2009 11:32 pm
theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
Stephen Moffat *lost*?

Well, okay, that's possible, who'd he lose to...

To Joss Fucking Whedon?

Fandom, you have no taste.

PS: Foglio, FUCK YES.

(link via [livejournal.com profile] affreca)
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 03:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Yes, actually, fandom does.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Does have no taste? I'm glad to hear you agree!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 03:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Wow. It's like going back to the fifth grade.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 03:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I know you are but what am I?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 03:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
I am rubber, you are glue....




(Actually, I'd be hard pressed to say whether I liked "Silence in the Library" or "Dr. Horrible" more. I might give Dr. Horrible the edge, because Silence was a little too derivative of "The Time Traveler's Wife".)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kierthos.livejournal.com
Well, of course, parts of fandom have no taste. How else could you explain that Twilight garbage?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
They're eating the Orson Scott Card demographic (http://theweaselking.livejournal.com/3393362.html)?

Sadly, not yet literally.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
I think that the Who vote may have been split, what with "Silence" and "Turn Left" in the ballot.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Fuck Doctor Who. Rusty Davies is an imbecile. The actual vote is *Stephen Moffat* (and product) versus *Joss Whedon* (and product), and anyone who picks Whedon given that is an illiterate, incompetent asshole, by definition.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:32 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
The actual vote is *Stephen Moffat* (and product) versus *Joss Whedon* (and product)

Not everybody sees it that way.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
This is sad. And, as a consequence, Twilight The Series's fans are still distorting the votes several years later.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
No, but those who do vastly outnumber those who don't.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
Clearly not.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
As much as I like his stuff, he pretty much deserves it.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Then why does it keep happening?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
Well, I guess I'm an illiterate, incompetent asshole in your estimation, then.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Especially among those willing to pony up the cost of a Hugo vote!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
You misunderstand. I'm claiming that people don't see the Hugos as purely producer/product versus producer/product, which explains why "Turn Left" might have cost "Silence" the win. That is precisely what happened.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
(apart from Jekyll and his work on Doctor Who, I'm not overwhelmingly impressed with Moffat. Coupling was amusing enough, but it was essentially Friends with knob jokes.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I am saddened.

(I really, really hate Joss Whedon. Monumental, world-destroying hate.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I have found Moffat to be consistently better than contemporary competitors. And, as mentioned before, I wouild consider the universe a better place if Whedon was killed and left in a grave never to be discovered by human efforts.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
Not sure what he did to earn your antipathy, but Buffy remains one of my favorite shows of all time, as was Firefly. Dr. Horrible was just really, really fun to watch.


And, as I said, the entire River Song subplot from Silence in the Library/Forests of the Dead was blagged in whole cloth from the Time Travelers Wife. I loved the episodes, and I love that book, but that part was completely blagged.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 04:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
Umm.... Why?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-08-10 05:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Because Buffy The Vampire Slayer, the movie, was offensively terrible. Because Buffy The TV Show wasn't any better, nor was The Buffy Spinoff, and "Buffy... in... SPAAAAAACE" actively worked to offend further. Follow that up with Dollhouse?

Holy shit.

Whedon's fetishes are disturbingly clear AND, in addition to being a CREEPY FUCKING ASSHOLE on the level of [livejournal.com profile] theferrett and his "Open Source Boobs Project", he's a bad writer who can't write a story that he's not obviously jerking off to.

He's CREEPY.

And his *fans* are REALLY CREEPY.

like Left Behind or Twilight level creepy.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 07:29 pm