(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 08:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dolston.livejournal.com
HAHAHA! This is a funny twist.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missysedai.livejournal.com
It's not
quite
as dumb as it sounds.

The state not only does not permit same-sex marriages, it doesn't recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. So it doesn't have jurisdiction to grant the divorce. This (http://www.asil.org/insigh111.cfm) does a pretty decent job of explaining why.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
My lack of explanation is funnier.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 11:23 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (evil)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Maybe for weak-sauce Canadian values of "funnier"...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kafziel.livejournal.com
What I'm curious about is, those places don't recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. You get gay married in Massachusetts, Virginia don't give a shit, and won't divorce you because it doesn't consider you married in the first place. Suppose you then get straight married in Virginia. At what point do you become guilty of bigamy? Instantly, but only in states that recognize the Massachusetts marriage? As soon as you enter a state that does recognize the Massachusetts marriage?

This is why comity exists. Fucking homophobes.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] opaqueplanet.livejournal.com
you popped my brain. I love you a little.

(but not enough to gay!marry you)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kierthos.livejournal.com
I think this should be tested. Quick, someone find a few people willing to get married to test a court case!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 12:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] falconwarrior.livejournal.com
But still pretty dumb that the state not only does not permit same-sex marriages, it doesn't recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kingfox.livejournal.com
That'll show them!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 10:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unknownpoltroon.livejournal.com
There is an easy solution. Illinois dosent recognise Massachusetts marriages? Fine. Mass dosent recognise Illinois marriages any more either. Fuck em.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-22 10:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unknownpoltroon.livejournal.com
THat should have read Indiana. But fuck Illinois anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Or Canadian marriages, whichever.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 01:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
You have to protect the sanctity of traditional divorce.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 11:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com
Those gay divorces are gonna ruin my Straight marriage!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reyl.livejournal.com
So, what if you got married as an opposite-sex couple, and then one of you had a sex change? Would your marriage suddenly be invalid? Would you still be married, but no longer be able to get divorced? Probably the former.

/straight married and soon to be gay divorced
/loves Canada

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-23 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kafziel.livejournal.com
Well, it might depend on whether the state you're in permits changes in legal gender. Many don't!

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 06:20 am