theweaselking: (Work now)
[personal profile] theweaselking
Oooh, I can has desktop. And Your Momma jokes. How odd.

So: Install took *for fucking ever* and had multiple 20+ minute waits, at least one of which was a crash and it only fixed when I yanked the power and rebooted. For the rest, they mostly just lacked progress bars. I am *not* impressed, but I accept that this might be partially due to the fact that my machine is Weird Fucking Shit as far as desktops go.

So far, the desktop looks like Vista. Which is a bad sign, but not unexpected. Am running "Experience Index" score now.

EDIT: Rebooting was very quick and very spiffy. Didn't listen to me when I told it FUCK OFF NO SOUNDS, but got past that quickly!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
But If you just consider the upgrade, it's even worse. Vista and Win7 are pretty much the same. And I think we should do some benchmarking to prove it.

I almost never restart the computer so I don't know how fast vista is restarting, but I could easily time it - and I would be surprised if it were more than 2 or 3 minutes. Still, just a slightly faster startup time is not worth a $100 upgrade. Maybe $10.

I don't know what you are talking about slow or bloated. I just don't see it - or how Windows 7 is faster. The UI is almost the same. Aero works almost the same. Where is it bloated, can you please show me one example? Just tell me what to do - I'll record it in my computer or something. Please I'm begging here.

I think you are deluding yourself. Win7 is Vista with a slightly touched up interface and kernel, nothing else. I also doubt you actually have a Nethalem processor if you think vista is "slow" in them.

Just *how* does vista punish you? Sorry, I don't see it. Just disable UAC.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
I just put the computer to sleep, waited a bit and awoke it. It took Windows Vista 11 seconds to awake. I'll try restarting now.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 07:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
OK, restarting. From the moment I turned the computer back on until I went into www.google.com and saw the google logo: 50 seconds.

I can record this if you don't believe me. With a clock nearby or whatever.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 07:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
(that is, opened firefox and went to google)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 07:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
Now i'm going to try a much older computer that's been off for days. Let's see.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
2 minutes 47 seconds, including my not remember the password.

This is a dual core AMD machine, with 4GB of 667MHz RAM.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
(typo; I meant nehalem)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
If you just consider the upgrade, it's even worse. Vista and Win7 are pretty much the same

Except people aren't upgrading from Vista, because they don't *use* Vista. They're upgrading *from XP*.

Also: You talk about not seeing any bloat, and also about *using Aero*, at the same time. I do not think that means what you think it means.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
The main point remains: I don't see how Windows 7 and Vista are so different. Please, show me something, tell me what to compare; I want to be convinced.

Assuming you are correct, people are upgrading from XP to 7 for marketing reasons. It is my belief that you did, too. Vista is nowhere as different as you would like it to be.

Aero is one of the most visible bloats of vista. Turning Aero off makes a huge difference in usability and overall speed, especially with older computers that support it (the transparency etc are annoying to use in older computers cause the windows seem to DRAG, and they are still present in win7). Other than that, what visible bloat can you name?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-01 08:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
*Marketing*?

Apparently you didn't read the initial post in the series that led up to this, which is to say that *my RAID ate itself* and XP wouldn't boot outside of Safe Mode. And since I needed an OS reinstall, and because I do this kind of thing for a living, I figured I might as well check out the new thing that's going to be making my life more difficult for the next 5-10 years.

And:
It's faster than XP.
It's cleaner than Vista, with a smaller memory footprint.
It doesn't get "helpful" with gadget bars, or demand that I actually *work* to kill Aero, or give me any shit about killing Windows Media Player the way Vista did.

In addition to being *faster to boot* and *making me turn off less shit* than Vista, I've found getting at Networking settings easier, I've found driver installs to be easier with the exception of the current NVidia fuckery that appears to be Nvidia's fault, and there are some excellent back-end things like swapping the user on a running process without restarting it.

All of these make it an attractive option. Vista was *annoying*. Physically aggravating. Unnecessarily difficult. Shiny, but stupid. Mac-like. 7, so far, has not raised my blood pressure nearly as much as Vista has, and while I had to tweak things to get it the way I like it, I had to do fewer tweaks than XP. Oh, and since it's not 3/4 of a decade old, the installer didn't give me any shit about my RAID or my disk drives or my graphics card.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-06 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
OK, I will bite.

Windows 7 is not faster than XP. We can benchmark it if you want.

It may have a smaller memory footprint, I'll give you that - I'm not sure that's the case.

Helpful? Now I don't get you. The first thing I did was get rid of the gadget shit - I don't use it on Win7 either (where it's still present but in a slightly modified form!!!) That whole point is moot if you can just disable the gadget shit with 2 clicks.

I'm sure any half-competent techie could have fixed your RAID problem.

About Mac, it got to a point where its UI is faster than Windows'. I think that's pitiful - Windows UI was always much faster.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-06 12:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Your comments are showing that you're not reading what people are saying before you respond to claim that they're not answering your questions, and it doesn't make me interested in having you around.

And your intimations that I'm incompetent because you didn't read my original explanation for why I reinstalled rather than bothering to event attempt a repair? Fuck you. READ THE POSTS.

You can *actually* read what people are saying and talk *to* them rather than grinding your axe against strawman versions, or you can go fuck yourself and not comment on my journal. Your choice.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-06 12:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anktastic.livejournal.com
I won't comment anymore on this then, because I do like some of the stuff you post. I know what you think, and you know what I think, and there's really nowhere positive we can go from here. Hope our next conversation is more illuminating for us both.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 05:47 pm