theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
US Congress passes change in procedures redefining "quorum" to mean "as many people as show up" in case of emergency.

The definition of "emergency"? "Natural disaster, attack, contagion or similar calamity rendering Representatives incapable of attending the proceedings of the House."

That's right. A big snowstorm hits the Beltway and DC freezes, and suddenly any five congressmen can pass laws and declare war.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
On the positive side - any five Democrat congressmen can vote to impeach Bush.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I do not believe this word means what you think it means.

(To be "impeached" is "to be formally charged with a crime while in office." I believe you're looking to have him thrown out of office, which I don't hink is a power of Congress.)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Addendum: And having people abuse the rules unconstitutionally in favour of their agenda is bad no matter who does it. This is the complaint *against* the Republicans - that they're liars, cheats, and criminals - and adopting their tactics is still a bad thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
No, it means exactly what I think it means, Mr. Condescendy-pants.

While I would like to have him thrown out of office, impeachment is one of the few things that Congress can do against a sitting president, hence my suggestion.

:-p

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 04:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Last I checked, Congress isn't a court.

Unless I'm missing something, here.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 05:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
That's funny, when the whole Clinton impeachment trial happened, it was the result of a vote in congress.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 05:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Quite possibly my bad. That link isn't exactly clear, thoguh, about what happened, when.

Either way, impeachment doesn't remove him from office, and all it would REALLY accomplish is the congressmen in question would be accused of "political terrorism" and held incommunicado in Cuba while they're beaten and raped for the rest of their shortened lives. That's SOP these days, apparently.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
It becomes the court of law during removal proceedings, presided over by the Chief Justice of the United States.

During impeachment proceedings, it's still the House.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spartonian.livejournal.com
"We vote to disband the military!"

Not that it would happen... but its a disturbingly amusing idea, followed by invasion by people with hockey sticks and funny accents.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-12 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
We'd only take the blue states, you guys can keep the red states.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 1st, 2026 03:29 am