The extra amusing bit would be if the AK-47 wasn't.
(the entire AK series has very similar profiles in the standard configuration -- virtually impossible to tell apart in a photo of this size. It could be any of AK-47, AKM, AK-74 or AK-74M)
Well, yes, but that one's obvious. I'm trying to go all *meta* on this and stuff. Unintentional humour and all that. Maybe it was only funny in my head. (would've been better if I could actually demonstrate the picture wasn't an AK-47 but, as per above, no such luck)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-18 11:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-18 11:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 03:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 03:09 am (UTC)awesome!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 03:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 07:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 04:26 am (UTC)(the entire AK series has very similar profiles in the standard configuration -- virtually impossible to tell apart in a photo of this size. It could be any of AK-47, AKM, AK-74 or AK-74M)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 05:09 am (UTC)Unless I'm misinterpreting you, it isn't. They've got the AK labeled as an M-16 and the M-16 labeled as an AK.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 05:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 05:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 01:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-19 01:43 pm (UTC)