(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-27 04:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] violent-rabbit.livejournal.com
That is unfortunate. :( I was so hopeful when I read his blog. Although, come to think of it, the question evasion worthy of a politician in the comments was a red flag.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-27 11:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spawnofweevil.livejournal.com
Sorry, but can I object to 'Christian (and hence bigot)'? Yes there are a lot of right-wing bible-bashing homophobic/racist idiots out there, but not every Christian is a bigot. Really.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-27 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corkdorkdan.livejournal.com
Nope, moderation is not permitted on TWK.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-27 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
You can totally object.

I'm not going to CHANGE it - while there are non-bigots who claim to be Christian, I'm of the opinion that those people are inaccurately labelling themselves, because they're ignoring the defining characteristics of the religion and the primary message of the Bible.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-27 06:04 pm (UTC)
ext_22548: (Default)
From: [identity profile] cmattg.livejournal.com
Wow. I don't think I've ever seen a reverse No True Scotsman before.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-27 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Hardly.

We've got a group that claims certain things to be true and certain practices to be required for membership.

We then have a second group, who claim to be members of the first group, who claim the SAME THINGS to be true and who claim THE SAME PRACTICES to be required - and who then don't do those practices and act as if they don't believe those things.

BOTH GROUPS AGREE on the requirements to be a "Christian", but only group 1 actually does 'em. Group 2 doesn't do 'em, and claims to be Christians anyway despite it.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-28 12:50 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-28 02:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Put another way:

"You weren't born in Scotland. You don't live in Scotland. You're not related to any Scotsmen. You've never actually even BEEN to Scotland for more than a week. You're not fucking Scottish, stop with the fake brogue"

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-28 07:38 am (UTC)
mmexlibris: (cucumber error)
From: [personal profile] mmexlibris
The label of "Christian" is far too broad to paint every Christian you meet with the bigot brush.

That's the kind of broken logic that says "All gays are promiscuous" and "All Muslims are terrorists."
Edited Date: 2010-08-28 07:39 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-09-06 07:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goblinpaladin.livejournal.com
Except 'promiscuous' isn't a requirement for being 'gay' and 'blowing up civilians' isn't a requirement for being a Muslim.

Accepting the word of Christ as gospel is pretty central to bein' Christian, though, and Christ was a fucknut.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 04:04 am