(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tisiphone.livejournal.com
Given my experience today, I feel like going out there with a can of gasoline and a blowtorch.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 12:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tisiphone.livejournal.com
No, no. I promise I'll do it perfectly silently.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
But a man wrote that chunk of the book, which means that not obeying it is usurping the authority of that man to say that you can't usurp the authority of a man.

SO THAR.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tisiphone.livejournal.com
'Snot a book. 'S a billboard. Prove to me that a man wrote the billboard.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
ObVious: There are lots of men in advertising. A woman who set up that billboard would be usurping the authority of at least one man, and thus wouldn't have done it. QED.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tisiphone.livejournal.com
Well, I'm a godless heathen anyhow, so it doesn't matter.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I don't think you quite understand the basic principle, here.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-04 07:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Unless the woma/en set up the billboard.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sparkindarkness.livejournal.com
I hereby give you 1 internet :)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-04 07:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
I don't know, can you?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
Well if it wasn't a photoshop job it'd most likely be a billboard put up by atheists and rationalists to claim that all religion is evil, sexist, corrupt, etc., etc.

This verse tends not to end up in modern cathecisms, although it was used quite frequently in the middle ages, particularly the 12th century when the church was trying to curb the power that many abbesses were using in their political spheres (Eleanor of Aquitane is a hero of many medievalist feminists, mostly because her husband would have kept having to throw her in jail regardless of her gender)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
There's a whole series of verses there, if you click on the image.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 07:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pope-guilty.livejournal.com
You're a pathetic reminder of how awful one's arguments must be to defend the indefensible.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tisiphone.livejournal.com
Really? I doubt it.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kytheraen.livejournal.com
Fuck off God :3

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] graethorne.livejournal.com
Yeah. To be expected of a bunch trying to force a change from a matriarchal tribal society into a patriarchal one. Whittle the numerous gods and spirits down to one almighty boss, backed up by a passle of gender-maybed angels.

Bugger 'em w' a turbo lathe, sez I...

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
Matriarchal tribal societies died out at least 1000 years before Paul wrote that letter to Timothy. This also came from the height of the Roman Empire which was an extremely patriarchal (pagan) society that influenced every culture that it conquered. It also had the aquaducts.

Meet the Iroquois and Haida.

Date: 2011-02-03 03:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
http://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.ca/lifestyle.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haida_people

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 07:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] graethorne.livejournal.com
Am referring to the gradual change in the "Israelites" over time. Tho' New Testament in origin, the quote is very Old Testament.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eididdy.livejournal.com
I'm wondering if some non-believer put that up as an answer to all the other billboards God advertises his will on. God's big on sending his will down to us. Moses got a burning bush, we get Clear Channel.

...he's lost his theatricality over the years, hasn't he?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
It's a photoshop job. Click the link for more.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] singingnettle.livejournal.com
That Old Testament version of God was just a laugh a minute.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 02:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
The one I linked is *new* Testament - I Timothy, AKA Paul Of Tarsus' first letter to Timothy.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 02:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] singingnettle.livejournal.com
Shows you how much attention I pay to the Bible. (I was thinking more of the other "billboards" on the site, though. With the rocks and slaves and selling of daughters and all.)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Oh, no, Jesus had instructions about those, too. But most of the money shots on that site are old-testament, despite new-testament-Jehovah not being materially different.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
So you should probably read She Nailed a Stake Through His Head: Tales of Biblical Terror (http://www.amazon.com/She-Nailed-Stake-Through-Head/dp/0976654679/) with 9 stories based on the Bible and only one based on NT.

Of course, Nietzsche called the hamfisted act of placing the Old and New Testament in one book is the greatest literary crime of humanity.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] singingnettle.livejournal.com
And we bother to ban books like Catcher in the Rye for sex and violence...

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Israel in 4BC had no mass communication!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peristaltor.livejournal.com
Don't ya get me wrong. . . .

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cleodhna.livejournal.com
Technically, not God, but Paul, who we know to have been a misogynistic dorkball. Of course, Paul claims to know what God thinks, but that's beside the point: the billboard is lying.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Are you saying that the Bible isn't the received Word of God?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 02:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] illian.livejournal.com
The reception is a bit staticy. We may need a new tuner.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Your userpic is sending me subliminal messages!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 01:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
(Of course, it's quite clear that ANYTHING anyone attributes to "God" is a fabrication, theirs or someone else's. That's not the point.)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peristaltor.livejournal.com
Nice usepic. Loved the movie.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-04 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cleodhna.livejournal.com
Quite. But the billboardist is putting Paul's words (as received, in the bible) in God's mouth. Paul might not have minded that, but it irks me when bible thumpers can't get their attributions straight. Paul might be speaking for God, but that's an additional piece of information we don't have with the bare quotation. Quotations aren't commutative like that. I suppose if one takes it as axiomatic that absolutely everything in the bible is the word of god and true, well then, logically, okay, but we're all going to hell for our mixed fibres and the defects in our eyes and feet.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] singingnettle.livejournal.com
Let us know how that goes for you, okey dokey?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Just watch the USA, they're the closest-to-modern sorts still implementing it.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] singingnettle.livejournal.com
The USA fills me with despair. Which really sucks, since I am American.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Hey, 80% of teachers in America are women! (Said ironically)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-03 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spartonian.livejournal.com
Fucker... he stole my t-shirt idea!!!

(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-04 02:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ardys-the-ghoul.livejournal.com
This reminds me--the Jehovah's Witnesses came by last week and I was too nice to tell them to get lost.

I have a sinus infection now, so I'm feeling less charitable.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 05:59 am