![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The constitutionality of a government employee's speech is contingent on whether or not that speech creates a distraction in the workplace and, if it does, it is not protected so long as the distraction outweighs its political worth. This is the same reason that a soldier, according to people like John McCain, shouldn't announce that he or she is gay. Doing so, the argument goes, would create a "mortal distraction." In the case of the Hooker Teacher, in order to fire me the DOE needed only to prove that my writing created a disruption in my school community and that such a disruption had little societal value. Whether it was my speech or the speech of the New York Post that created the disruption was, of course, an argument to be made.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-10 01:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-10 01:48 am (UTC)What's the URL you're hitting?
EDIT:
http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/05/04/hooker_teacher_what_i_was_thinking/index.html
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-10 01:55 am (UTC)