(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-03 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rimrunner.livejournal.com
Ohio!

...no, wait.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-03 11:47 pm (UTC)
kjn: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kjn
Motorcyclists without helmets are mobile organ donors. At least they finally might do something that may help some other person.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-04 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lightinchains.livejournal.com
I seem to recall an argument a while back on an otherwise reasonable person's LJ where they were bitching about having to wear a seatbelt in the back of a car. It boggles the mind, it does.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-05 06:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undeadbydawn.livejournal.com
I am equally puzzled by the number of cyclists who refuse to wear helmets, including the somewhat awkward argument that you're more likely to get a head injury walking.



I know of very few people who can walk at 20mph amongst heavy traffic.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-05 10:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
With the cars *out to get them*, I will point out.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-09 03:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pappy-legba.livejournal.com
To be fair, a helmet's effectiveness falls off above speeds around 20KPH. At highway speeds, the helmet is the difference between death and a life as a quadriplegic. If helmet-nonwearers were willing to sign a sort of living will ("I want to die outright and not be on life support"), I wouldn't have much problem with it.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 8th, 2026 11:34 am