I love living in the future.
Aug. 10th, 2011 10:52 pmMIT produces what appears to be a working broad-spectrum *antiviral*.
It works in trials against the common cold, H1N1 flu, dengue fever, polio, and several others.
"The drug works by targeting a type of RNA produced only in cells that have been infected by viruses. “In theory, it should work against all viruses,” says Todd Rider, a senior staff scientist in Lincoln Laboratory’s Chemical, Biological, and Nanoscale Technologies Group"
It works in trials against the common cold, H1N1 flu, dengue fever, polio, and several others.
"The drug works by targeting a type of RNA produced only in cells that have been infected by viruses. “In theory, it should work against all viruses,” says Todd Rider, a senior staff scientist in Lincoln Laboratory’s Chemical, Biological, and Nanoscale Technologies Group"
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 03:52 am (UTC)I love living in the future, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 04:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 04:38 am (UTC)Doesn't make this a bad thing! just a potential complication.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 05:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-15 08:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 08:52 am (UTC)In any case, I doubt that a curative medicine like this would ever be allowed to see the light of day. The medical establishment doesn't want cures, they want TREATMENTS that generate ongoing income for them over years and decades. That's why this stuff you're talking about will probably never be mass-marketed. If it were, it could be a financial calamity for the drug industry who don't want large numbers of people to be disease-free. The medical establishment actually wants a significant percentage of us to be ill. If people could be cured of all viral diseases easily, they would lose a substantial portion of their customer base. That's why, if this anti-viral is ever made available, be assured, they will charge a king's ransom for it.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 11:59 am (UTC)Our medical establishment isn't profit driven. Here, "treatment" is not a commodity, it's an obnoxious cost to be minimized. Cures over "treatments" reduce ongoing government costs, and healthy people work more and thus pay more taxes.
Not everyone's medical system is set up to farm sick people.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 02:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 05:44 pm (UTC)This theory fails to explain the vaccine industry, and ignores the substantial public health efforts made to, for instance, reduce childhood obesity in order to avoid future chronic conditions.
-- Steve will admit that the theory triggers his argumentative reflex, given that it's often used by "complementary and alternative medicine" advocates to decry studies disproving the effectiveness of CAM procedures and thereby peeing in their rice bowls.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-15 08:57 am (UTC)Also, not all doctors fucking suck as human beings and a lot of them will work to save a lot of lives just because.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-11 11:48 am (UTC)This is starting to sound like science fiction.
No wait, most sci-fi has people complaining that they still haven't found a cure!