(no subject)
Jan. 20th, 2012 10:42 pmHey Leigh: Why do you bother trying to talk to Kratman? Dude is *literally* a neo-nazi. Not a "his political positions are fascist therefore" nazi, a literal no-doubt-possible argues-repeatedly-in-print-in-his-own-words nazi, claiming the Waffen SS were the only military force on earth truly capable of saving civilisation from the dirty non-white foreigners.
Dude has spent years not just as a white supremacist, but as a *literal* nazi-fetishist. Why treat him any differently than David Lane or William Pierce?
EDIT: Oh, right, I forgot he obsessively ego-googles. And has shown up here, with an impressively Kratmanlike "How dare you say I dislike minorities? Some of my best friends are minorities! You are a bad person because you are a minority and they are all bad people!" in the *very first comment*.
My "why bother engaging, he's a bigoted moron" question still stands. I've corrected the problem of his arguing the point here, because, well, "why bother engaging, he's a bigoted moron." If he'd like to correct that, he has his own website, and a publisher. He doesn't get space here, any more than David Duke does.
Dude has spent years not just as a white supremacist, but as a *literal* nazi-fetishist. Why treat him any differently than David Lane or William Pierce?
EDIT: Oh, right, I forgot he obsessively ego-googles. And has shown up here, with an impressively Kratmanlike "How dare you say I dislike minorities? Some of my best friends are minorities! You are a bad person because you are a minority and they are all bad people!" in the *very first comment*.
My "why bother engaging, he's a bigoted moron" question still stands. I've corrected the problem of his arguing the point here, because, well, "why bother engaging, he's a bigoted moron." If he'd like to correct that, he has his own website, and a publisher. He doesn't get space here, any more than David Duke does.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 05:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 05:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 05:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 05:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:29 am (UTC)He really _is_ a liar and a fool, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:50 am (UTC)Now stop being silly, will you?
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 06:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 07:01 am (UTC)I mean, seriously, I want to know the rules on when a rebuttal is not a rebuttal.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 07:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 07:11 am (UTC)By the way, go look, look really hard, for a defense, by me, of the ideology of Nazism. Not what some asswipe, liar, and fool like the weasel _claimed_ I've written, but that I've actually written.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 07:30 am (UTC)I could cull your written works for evidence but frankly I'd rather go to bed, and I'm willing to trust the opinion of TheWeaselKing over that of some internet weirdo who still thinks "cocksucker" is a big bad swear word.
Really - it's 2012, cocksucking is pretty ubiquitous, you need a new insult. If you're creative enough you could even come up with one of your own! Like fuckknuckle, or shitspittle. The English language is a vast open plain of potentially offensive compound words, and I welcome you to explore it.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 07:30 am (UTC)However, in a spirit of charity, and for your further education, and further assuming that there really was some lowbrow Klansman or neo-nazi out there somewhere who suggested just such a thing, here's the difference on that. If one were to go out and rape X-color women, taking no responsibility or care for any children, then you're diluting their genepool. However, if you put all your reproductive and paternal effort into one women or X-color, and the resulting children, you're diluting your own gene pool, which is, again, incompatable with keeping your white supremacist card.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 07:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-21 07:34 am (UTC)