Yes, the original shot of the kids shows that Glasses Kid is "O". But! (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/03/were-suckers-for-cute-kids-campaign-style/)
Doesn't look like the same shot (different background, different expressions). The M and O kids are the same height and gender, they could have been put in the wrong shirts or the wrong order for a few seconds. (Mind, I'm not saying it's not shopped - I didn't examine the pixels. But I'd be willing to bet this is a common schtick for a man who drove to Canada with the family dog strapped to the roof of the car.)
Ah! I was misreading your comment - I thought "The M and O kids are the same height and gender," as in "the M kid in the first shot and the M kid in the second shot look alike, and the O kids look alike".
I dunno, but a bit more photoshopping could also spell 'Mormon', 'Mommy', 'Moron' and a host of other things. The point being, nobody is safe from 'shoppers.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 05:15 pm (UTC)-- Steve agrees it's funny as Hell, and appropriate, but odds are it's fake.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 05:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 06:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 06:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 06:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 06:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 06:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-08 09:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 06:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 07:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-07 09:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-08 05:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-08 04:45 pm (UTC)