(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-15 04:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
I'm disappointed by the hyperbole and sensationalism in that article, given the geek cred of the site..

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-15 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
They're still spawn of Gawker.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-15 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
True, true.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-15 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I was here to say GAWKER MEDIA, but I see Jack beat me to it.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-15 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pappy-legba.livejournal.com
City officials' ignorance of it is an eye-opener, but otherwise it's not huge news. It was 1974; Kodak was still a tech giant, and there were still the remnants of a gee-whiz attitude toward nuclear research. At least they weren't injecting plutonium and uranium into humans. (http://www.nytimes.com/1995/01/19/us/radiation-tests-used-some-healthy-people.html?src=pm)

I can look out my window at Kodak office. Wonder what else is hiding there.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-15 05:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pappy-legba.livejournal.com
...and Kodak Park is not exactly downtown. If downtown Rochester is nano-Manhattan, this was somewhere around the border of pico-Yonkers.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-15 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
And people say I'm hard to shop for.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-05-16 02:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cosmiccat.livejournal.com
That sounds like the sort of thing any hospital with a large radiology department has. Actually, theirs is probably cooler. Hell, there was a school facility in Canada that was heated using a nuclear reactor as a power source for years.

Oh, right, Gawker. NUKES SCARY BOOGA BOOGA BOOGA.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 30th, 2026 09:40 pm