(no subject)
Aug. 24th, 2012 08:49 amThere's nothing quite like "Uh, the NAS came up after the reboot but it isn't talking to anything. Looks like all four NICs are down. Do we even OWN a machine with a serial port to go talk to it?" to give you a nice dose of adrenaline in the morning.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 01:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 01:25 pm (UTC)(Because NOBODY USES SERIAL DAMMIT! But that's not the point - serial actually has some major advantages if you've got a hundred devices using it, but most of those vanish when it's more like "two")
But yes: Serial communications are VERY much a thing with high-end network devices. Routers, NAS devices, all kinds of things.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 01:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 05:31 pm (UTC)From embedded via routers&switches to Real Servers (though the latter's dying).
And as a sys-/net-admin I'll take a (tried and stable) 16550 UART over a USB chipset that needs special drivers any time.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 05:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 11:23 pm (UTC)Otherwise:
you can not imagine my joy when I discovered that the new HP 'orkstations we got last year had *real serial ports*, and with a bog-standard, tried-across-the-ages, 16550 UART even.
Meaning I could startup-configure those pesky routers without constantly swearing at those damn usb2seraial converters.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 02:16 pm (UTC)Yeah you stock up on converters, but that incurs the cost of buying converters to have them redundant everywhere you need them ($15*X becomes significant cash pretty quickly), and it's still an extra point of failure in a workflow that could be mission-critical.
The cost of serial vs. USB in less expensive devices can be a significant factor, but as soon as the pricetag is anywhere near a grand there really isn't much excuse.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 03:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 03:41 pm (UTC)Even if that's the case, then they should just bolt on a USB adapter you're using over the serial port.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 05:27 pm (UTC)First of all: serial is trivial and tried, and the codebase has matured. Native-console-over-USB is neither of those. The codebase, which needs to reside in some sort of BIOS, would also need quite more space. Then there's the range issue - nothing easier than plugging a serial port into a good old-fashioned modem, and you got your out-of-band access.
For all of these reasons (and some others, probably) noone does console-over-USB.
Serial for console access is slowly but steadily eaten away by other things, though (IPMI, iLO, LOM etc.) all with native IP stacks and their own network ports. But not by USB, and probably won't be.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 09:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 11:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 11:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-25 12:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 01:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-24 11:42 pm (UTC)... but the hinges are broken on my laptop, and I should ask IT for a new one, but I believe the replacement IBM has no native serial port and relies on a USB adapter. Meh.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-25 11:41 am (UTC)They do sell a (rather pricey) addon express card that'll do the job, but it's just not the same...
(no subject)
Date: 2012-08-26 05:09 am (UTC)