The perspective looks like it was shot with a long lens, based on the sort of flat look of kitty's face, but without similar shots using different focal lengths to compare, I'm not super-certain.
I probably wouldn't have used a zoom lens for that. Probably a 400mm prime, maybe with a teleconverter, or even a mirror lens if I had one. Then again, some modern zooms are smaller and lighter than the zooms I've got, so I dunno. The only way to be sure, short of asking the photographer, is if the focal length is in the EXIF data and turns out to be a length that prime lenses don't come in. (And considering how often zooms are used at one extreme or the other, even that trick might not reveal a zoom lens if one was used -- a 150-400 zoom all the way at the 400 end of its range would look just like a 400 prime in the EXIF tags.)
But yeah, I do hope the photographer used a long lens (and it looks like that's the case).
I would not want to shoot that with my 28-70mm zoom lens.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 01:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 02:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 05:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 07:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 12:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 01:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 02:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 01:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 02:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 02:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 04:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 05:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-13 09:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-13 09:34 am (UTC)But yeah, I do hope the photographer used a long lens (and it looks like that's the case).
I would not want to shoot that with my 28-70mm zoom lens.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 05:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-13 02:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-14 12:44 am (UTC)