(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-12 09:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
I thought grading on a curve was illegal or against the rules or frowned upon or just not done anymore... or something. I guess I just don't understand why it's done that way, other than to fuck some students up and to improperly reward others (no offense).

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-12 09:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com
Its a little frowned upon, except when it benefits the class.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-12 09:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlowe1.livejournal.com
I suppose it depends on how many people could pass the class without the curve.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-12 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glenn-3.livejournal.com
Oh, no offense taken. It benefited me, but it was still bullshit. It's like an asterisk on my Phi Kappa Phi membership.

It occurs to me now that maybe 101-level courses were graded...oh, let's say "gently"...because of all the people (like me) knocking out requirements that had nothing to do with what they'd eventually do. And so, if I'd taken the next level up in science courses, I would have been rudely surprised to find myself flunking. But none of my fuzzy-study courses graded on the curve, at any level. Professor's choice, perhaps.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-12 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ice-hesitant.livejournal.com
I once was curved from 74% to 100% on a Physics 100 midterm. Whee.

(no subject)

Date: 2012-12-12 01:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ice-hesitant.livejournal.com
There's multiple ways to do a curve (http://worthwhile.typepad.com/worthwhile_canadian_initi/2012/10/the-optimal-exam-question.html). I think you're thinking of only one of them.

Edit: Oops, not the link I was looking for, but it does give a list of reason to curve a class.
Edited Date: 2012-12-12 01:40 pm (UTC)

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 03:55 am