(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-04 02:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reynardo.livejournal.com
Pass me a sword - I'm heading to the local pond.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-05 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Unfortunately, you haven't got the rhetoric dialled quite high enough for that to pass the Poe's Law barrier. You sound too much like you actually believe that for it to be as funny as you probably want.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-05 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Well, you said that Romney would have been just as bad, that Obama was 50% responsible for the shutdown, that "better-if-not-good" health care was "universal healthcare", and that it was being "shoved down people's throats", and that taxpayers weren't asked about it as if polls and an entire election where the people campaigned on repealling the health care law didn't happen. And then you said Obama was perpetuating the shutdown.

Those are are hilariously wrong statements, so I figured you were trying to be funny. But they're not actually hilarious, because there are people sincerely saying all of those ignorant things.

(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-05 10:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I think you should be happy that the first steps towards a working health care system - to wit, taking money from everyone to pay for health care for everyone - are being taken, and I think you should be upset that it didn't go further. You know that "penalty for not having insurance" bullshit? That's bullshit, and that should instead be "your insurance premium on the mandatory-if-you-don't-buy-something-else policy that's necessary for public health to actually work and is objectively a great benefit to you *and* your fellow citizens". Which is to say you damn well should still have to pay it, you just should also get health care when you do.


Also, ACA was made law in 2010. In 2010 and 2012 there were elections held, and one party explicitly campaigned, in both cases, on the platform of repealing ACA. They lost, both times. Then they tried to repeal it anyway, and lost ~50 more times. That's *tons* of asking if people want it, to go along with it being objectively better than the current system even if it's not as good as a real system.


Furthermore, am I supposed to be happy that the people supposedly in charge of keeping this country working are too busy having a pissing match with each other to bother doing their jobs?

No, I think you should be pissed about that. But I think you should be pissed at the hostage-takers who are deliberately sabotaging your government and economy to prevent poor people from receiving closer-to-adequate health care, and not the people they're trying to intimidate.

Your country is fundamentally broken in a great many ways, but you should be pissed at the people *exploiting that brokenness to hurt you*, not the people who are trying to patch the holes.

And I didn't call you an idiot. I initially said I thought you were joking but hadn't taken things far enough for it to be funny, because I really thought you were trying for parody.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-06 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kafziel.livejournal.com
Aww, he deleted everything. I missed it :(

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-07 09:44 pm (UTC)
frith: Cosgrove/Onuki (anime retelling) (Applejack cross)
From: [personal profile] frith
Muffins! Fortunately, The King's replies are sufficiently detailed to get the gist.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-08 04:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
Dear god, who were you talking to? O.o

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-08 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glenn-3.livejournal.com
It was duncan something or other. I looked for his old posts to get his actual name, but when he took his ball and went home, he was very thorough!

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-08 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
"duncan_blkthrne". But he's deleted his livejournal account entirely.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-08 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glenn-3.livejournal.com
Ah. Probably not related to your conversation, then. I mean, that would be a pretty extravagant overreaction, wouldn't it?

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-08 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I would assume it to be a vast overreaction if it were only to me, yes. However, IIRC his last few posts he's been having a rough time of things in real life lately, and this might be unrelated or I might have been the last straw on the camel? I don't know. I'd have to ask him, and I don't have a way to do that that isn't "google his username and look for it on other sites"-level of lookup.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-10-09 12:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
I was, I confess, a bit stunned to see how throughly he had left. (Pursuant to [livejournal.com profile] theweaselking's comments below, I hope he is alright, merely annoyed.)

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 4th, 2026 10:00 pm