theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
 photo BlPqvlfIEAAdWwJjpglarge_zps52a693a1.jpg

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 12:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
And just now....

OK, I assumed cunning lay behind this. http://t.co/vMG7WHAwZ0 Should have used Hanlon’s Razor. http://t.co/nxMFslfY52 thx @TomChivers

— Dan Gardner (@dgardner) April 15, 2014


-- Steve's not sure whether this mitigates or spurs his disdain.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Yeah, I saw the comment thread where the designer was like "oh it looks BETTER that way, I was inspired by this much better, much clearer graph that didn't make any of my blatantly obvious mistakes"

Nicked from the weaselking

Date: 2014-04-15 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] livejournal.livejournal.com
User [livejournal.com profile] james_nicoll referenced to your post from Nicked from the weaselking (http://james-nicoll.livejournal.com/4898213.html) saying: [...] [...]

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peterchayward.livejournal.com
Am I missing something? Is this the same image twice? I'm so confused...

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phoenixm.livejournal.com
The y-axis goes is marked in descending order rather than (normal) ascending order. In other words, when the graph goes *down* in 2005, it means that the number of gun deaths was actually going up.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Sorry, the Embedded Tweet wasn't displaying properly for me so I rehosted the image. I'll "fix" the embed.

But there's supposed to be only one copy of the image. It's just set so that INCREASED murders are shown as a DROP on the graph.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 03:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herewiss13.livejournal.com
I'm ashamed to say it took me several moments to notice the unconventional notation of the Y-axis.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 05:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tisiphone.livejournal.com
It took me a few minutes, too. It was only when I noticed the actual number on the "1990s" end of the scale that I worked out what was wrong.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
I needed it pointed out.

(That said, I did go through a mental process of "there is fuckery here. ...aha! The headline talks about gun deaths, but the graph title is specifically about murders. I guess that gun killings committed under SYG law aren't legally murders, and the graph is being used to suggest that because there are fewer killings which meet the legal def of murder, there are fewer gun deaths, even though that's not the case." And then, having an explanation, I stopped looking.)

(It's been a bad kind of day.)

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 10:14 pm (UTC)
frith: Cosgrove/Onuki (anime retelling) (Derpy Hooves cloud)
From: [personal profile] frith
I cottoned on when I saw that the "873" data point was lower than the "721" data point. 9_9

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tsunami-ryuu.livejournal.com
Badly done axes are automatic point deductions whenever I TA. It's a pet peeve of mine, and I make sure my students know about it. I would gleefully dock this fellow for his, ah, "unconventional" (read: bullshit) y-axis. NICE TRY THERE, BUDDY, I see what you did.

(Also worth noting that the graph talks about firearm "murders", and technically a person who successfully invokes Stand Your Ground as a defense isn't a murderer per se, they just committed homicide in "self defense". So if the people who designed this really used murder counts to make the graph, that's also weaselly. They should use deaths by firearm instead for a more honest assessment.)

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-15 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I'm willing to take "stand your ground correlates with the murder rate spike, REGARDLESS of number of successful SyG fake-self-defense acquittals" as useful information, too.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-16 01:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tsunami-ryuu.livejournal.com
Hah, same. I think the spike is telling enough as is... I'm just curious how much worse it could get if the SYG acquittals were thrown into the mix.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-16 01:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dantheserene.livejournal.com
Murder is bad. Justifiable homicide is unfortunate, but less so than the death of a crime victim.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-16 01:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
And yet, the actively-deceptive graph doesn't say it includes fake-justified "stand your ground" non-murders, only "murders". So bringing up "justifiable homicide" numbers is at best disingenuous.

(If you'd like to claim that the lying graph ALSO conflates fake-justified "stand your ground"-aquittal homicides with standard murders, feel free. Link sources. As it is, the chart implies that *murders* went down while sourcing statistics that say *murders* went up. While taking numbers from a source that has a vested interest in distinguishing "murders" from fake-justified "stand your ground"-aquittal homicides, and thus presumably made that distinction.)

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-16 01:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dantheserene.livejournal.com
Another thing that is confusing is the mixing of terms. "Deaths" and "murders" aren't the same thing since the former includes accidents, suicides, and justifiable homicides as well as murders. One is a subset of the other, so which does the graph show?

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-16 01:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
It says "murders". I would expect it means "murders", especially since there's no reason to lie-by-implication by inverting the Y-axis if you could just evade the question entirely by swapping out "murder" for a different term.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-04-16 05:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com
It shows total murders by firearm in the state of Florida, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement ("Murder: Firearm Type and Rate for Florida, 1971 - 2012").

(Because Reuters managed to not make the attribution for the data source misleading, unlike the title and the graph.)

ETA:

The FDLE specifically notes that justifiable homicides "should not be included in summary offense totals for homicide" (page 7).

The FDLE also notes that when it applies the label of "justified homicide" it is not referring to a determination made by a court of law, but only to an investigating officer's scoring of whether or not the death in question was "the killing of the perpetrator of a serious criminal offense either by a law enforcement officer in the line of duty or by a private citizen, during the commission of a serious criminal offense."

(Just to make sure everyone is on exactly the same page, and no-one is going to try to start using FDLE statistics to talk about firearm-deaths-where-the-shooters-were-legally-aquitted. Because that would be even more disingenuous than implying that all incidents in which SYG was invoked had been either-or situations wherein one person had to be shot or another person would die.)
Edited Date: 2014-04-16 05:27 am (UTC)

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Mar. 1st, 2026 01:02 pm