Given that you have just identified yourself as one of the bigots responsible
We're back to "do you read your own posts?" and "are you drunk?" as the questions of the hour. What the hell are you responding to?
What did I say that makes you think I've "identified" myself as something, what do you assert I've "identified" myself AS, and "responsible" for what?
Dude, if you *say specific things* and *put your answers in context* and *make sense*, things are much easier for those playing along in the home game.
it is hardly surprising that you have a pat answer prepared.
I had a great many answers, tailored to the specifics of your weird theory and its bizarre anachronisms. My answers were hardly "pat", although I note with amusement that you've chosen not to respond to even one of them.
Oh, and: despite your dismissal of them as "pat" and thus presumably trivial for you to refute, the only thing you *have* chosen to respond to is so incoherent that I really can't tell what point you think you're making!
I see where you get your ID from.
Oh man, I've never heard THAT one before. You're not even the first (or second) published Baen author to use that here[1], not even counting the just plain old kooks.
Are you going to flounce next? Because I'm sure *that* will be what causes me to change my tune and stop pointing out that your argument is inconsitent, incoherent, and awfully racist, you betcha. It's worked every time before!
[1]: without even counting Tommy The Ego Googler's sockpuppets. Add those and the number goes up further.
(no subject)
Date: 2014-04-25 09:45 pm (UTC)We're back to "do you read your own posts?" and "are you drunk?" as the questions of the hour. What the hell are you responding to?
What did I say that makes you think I've "identified" myself as something, what do you assert I've "identified" myself AS, and "responsible" for what?
Dude, if you *say specific things* and *put your answers in context* and *make sense*, things are much easier for those playing along in the home game.
it is hardly surprising that you have a pat answer prepared.
I had a great many answers, tailored to the specifics of your weird theory and its bizarre anachronisms. My answers were hardly "pat", although I note with amusement that you've chosen not to respond to even one of them.
Oh, and: despite your dismissal of them as "pat" and thus presumably trivial for you to refute, the only thing you *have* chosen to respond to is so incoherent that I really can't tell what point you think you're making!
I see where you get your ID from.
Oh man, I've never heard THAT one before. You're not even the first (or second) published Baen author to use that here[1], not even counting the just plain old kooks.
Are you going to flounce next? Because I'm sure *that* will be what causes me to change my tune and stop pointing out that your argument is inconsitent, incoherent, and awfully racist, you betcha. It's worked every time before!
[1]: without even counting Tommy The Ego Googler's sockpuppets. Add those and the number goes up further.