Real, True Headlines

[theweaselking]

"Study of Pot Smokers' Brains Shows That MRIs Cause Bad Science Reporting"

(Warning, crank site, full of bad logic and counterrational leaps. And they also make one of the very same mistakes they are complaining about: How do they know the MRIs *cause* bad science reporting, instead of just being correlated with bad science reporting in at least one case? But still, very funny.)

Comments

[harvey-rrit.livejournal.com]

Given that you have just identified yourself as one of the bigots responsible, it is hardly surprising that you have a pat answer prepared.

I see where you get your ID from.

[theweaselking.livejournal.com]

Given that you have just identified yourself as one of the bigots responsible

We're back to "do you read your own posts?" and "are you drunk?" as the questions of the hour. What the hell are you responding to?

What did I say that makes you think I've "identified" myself as something, what do you assert I've "identified" myself AS, and "responsible" for what?

Dude, if you *say specific things* and *put your answers in context* and *make sense*, things are much easier for those playing along in the home game.

it is hardly surprising that you have a pat answer prepared.

I had a great many answers, tailored to the specifics of your weird theory and its bizarre anachronisms. My answers were hardly "pat", although I note with amusement that you've chosen not to respond to even one of them.

Oh, and: despite your dismissal of them as "pat" and thus presumably trivial for you to refute, the only thing you *have* chosen to respond to is so incoherent that I really can't tell what point you think you're making!


I see where you get your ID from.

Oh man, I've never heard THAT one before. You're not even the first (or second) published Baen author to use that here[1], not even counting the just plain old kooks.

Are you going to flounce next? Because I'm sure *that* will be what causes me to change my tune and stop pointing out that your argument is inconsitent, incoherent, and awfully racist, you betcha. It's worked every time before!

[1]: without even counting Tommy The Ego Googler's sockpuppets. Add those and the number goes up further.

[theweaselking.livejournal.com]

"You were deleted by Harvey_Ritt".

Awwww. Does that mean you're going to flounce without ever explaining what the fuck you were talking about? Without even a proper "geez, I'm OUTTA here" post?

[harvey-rrit.livejournal.com]

???

"Flounce"?

This from the bigot who was threatening to censor me from the moment I caught him at it. So you didn't even get the ego trip of doing that, BFH. Maybe you can beat up some Jews to make yourself feel better. Crippled Jews, of course, or they'll be able to fight back.

Maybe you'd better limit it to just one.

And I would be fascinated to find out which Baen author you are lying about that you imagine I would not be able to check with.

[theweaselking.livejournal.com]

This from the bigot who was threatening to censor me from the moment I caught him at it.

Once again, you're saying unclear things. For example, what's the "it" that you imagine you "caught" me at?

And while we're at it, what did I say that makes you think I've "identified" myself as something, what do you assert I've "identified" myself AS, and "responsible" for what?

Dude, if you *say specific things* and *put your answers in context* and *make sense*, things are much easier.

So you didn't even get the ego trip of doing that, BFH.

I notice you're still incoherent. And not answering. And *still posting*.

Maybe you can beat up some Jews to make yourself feel better. Crippled Jews, of course, or they'll be able to fight back.

The mind boggles that you feel you are helping your case.

And I would be fascinated to find out which Baen author you are lying about that you imagine I would not be able to check with.

Hey, they're all public posts, man. Check all you want! Hint, one of them was Tommy The Ego Googler, who shows up when his name is mentioned, has a well-known history of creating sockpuppets when banned (and did so here!), and shares with you a rather.... CREATIVE sense of historical dates, times, and events. To the point where there's entire books worth of posts on some sites where history buffs point out what he's wrong about. rpg.net has a ton!

Once you find the post where he did that, finding the others should be easy.

[harvey-rrit.livejournal.com]

So you don't have one picked out.

I should have known.

[theweaselking.livejournal.com]

Dude. "Tommy the ego-googler". Makes sock puppets. Is terrible at history. Banned from rpg.net for truly *legendarily* stupid postings, over the course of months.

Put two and two together, for *once* in this thread.

[theweaselking.livejournal.com]

Also: You're still really unclear on your concepts, using pronouns to describe things without context and expecting non-sequitor responses to be understood - and then making *more* of them when asked "uh, what was that about"?

So let's try this one more time:

What's the "it" that you imagine you "caught" me at?

And while we're at it, what did I say that makes you think I've "identified" myself as something, what do you assert I've "identified" myself AS, and "responsible" for what?


But seriously. Go home, Matthew Joseph Harrington, you are drunk.

[lafinjack.livejournal.com]

Damn, I just heard this great quote the other day and now I can't find it again. It went something like "The last resort of the bigot is to complain of being censored, as they have no better argument to use for protection of their speech".

Also: you're not being censored if Mr. Weasel were to ban you. Just so you know.

[skiriki.livejournal.com]

XKCD alt-text.

[lafinjack.livejournal.com]

That's the exact (vague) citation I was thinking of, thanks!