theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
"This is not funny. It is terrifying. The Russians engage in a sloppy disinformation effort and, before the day is out, the Republican nominee for president is standing on a stage reciting the manufactured story as truth. How did this happen? Who in the Trump campaign was feeding him falsehoods straight from the Kremlin?"

(tl;dr: Russian government "news" agency Sputnik put out a false article that misleadingly attributed an out-of-context Kurt Eichenwald quote to Sidney Blumenthal. They retracted the story when the lie was exposed, within hours. And yet, Trump not only got a copy of the discredited Russian-language-only fake story, but he's repeating it.)

(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-11 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dionysus1999.livejournal.com
From a Soviet perspective, it's win-win. Discredit American politics, or actually get a stooge who seems to love Putin as President. No downside there.

(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-11 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com
Also, how have Wikileaks trashed their brand so thoroughly (or, through naïveté, let other people trash their brand for them)?

(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-11 11:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
It's been them trashing it themselves.

And, uh, it's more been letting their mask slip and showing, more and more, who their paymasters have always been.

(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-11 11:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com
I'm not so sure that they've always been in the pay of Putin. I think it's more that Assange is not actually a very good or reliable person (http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n05/andrew-ohagan/ghosting), and Putin has managed to exploit his anger at the US establishment.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Jul. 22nd, 2025 06:25 am