(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-14 01:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robby.livejournal.com
I wonder if he's distorting the Rasmussen poll, too!
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch_oct13

(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-14 03:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Unlikely. Rasmussen's stupid shit is all their own, and (as the article points out, if you'd bothered to read it) the problem with the LAT poll is that they're polling the same people every time, this dude is a major outlier because he's so aggressively stupid, and they've weighted him far out of any reasonable proportion.

(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-14 05:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robby.livejournal.com
If my candidate is behind the poll must be biased!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/10/05/if-my-candidate-is-behind-the-poll-must-be-biased/?utm_source=akdart

(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-14 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Read the original link, dumbass. If you don't understand it, that's okay, I can repeat it using shorter words than the NYT did - but until you read it, you can't discuss it intelligently. If after you read it, you STILL can't discuss it intelligently, you may have a problem.

(no subject)

Date: 2016-10-14 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dionysus1999.livejournal.com
We know those teens can be contrary. And hugely ignorant, as most of us were back then.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 04:37 am