Spider-Man movie news!
May. 5th, 2005 03:40 pm
#1: Thomas Haden Church has been signed as a villain in 3, but Raimi and the studio are keeping quiet which one, for now.
Rumour has it that he'd be Sandman. This seems unlikely, because Sandman isn't exactly one of the iconic villains - and they can't do the Sinister Six because
A) Multi-villain movies suck. See: Every Batman sequel
B) They'd need to introduce Sandman, Shocker, Electro, Vulture, and Mysterio - and Doctor Octopus is dead.
My bets are on Electro, Venom, or a non-superpowered villain. Given Curt Connors in 1 and 2, the Lizard would be a gimme, if he hadn't been played by Dylan Baker.
#2: Sam Raimi has said that Sony is talking abuot making a total of 6 Spider-Man films, and he's happy to direct the second three, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-05 08:19 pm (UTC)Maybe the Ult. Spidey version where the symbiote was created...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-05 09:33 pm (UTC)although it would be cool if they had him change costume, then do a cliff hanger where soem kidn of accident happens and the next movie it comes ot life...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-06 03:17 am (UTC)I mean, I'm pretty sure they had it back when the second team was assembled to rescue the original X-Men, which was before the Shi'ar's first appearance (though only by a couple of issues), and I don't recall them retconning in an explanation about the Blackbird.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-06 03:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-06 12:49 am (UTC)I think I heard it was going to be Sandman, and that guy sure looks like him.
Also, Batman Returns did not suck, but I know you have an irrational hatred of all things Batman, so I'll let it go.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-05-06 02:07 am (UTC)Peace