(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 12:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atlasimpure.livejournal.com
ter·ror·ism (těr'ə-rĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key
n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 04:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peristaltor.livejournal.com
That fits him perfectly.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atlasimpure.livejournal.com
"the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons. "

There was no such intent here, merely a willingness to use direct violence against a perceived enemy.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peristaltor.livejournal.com
There was no such intent here. . . .

Oh, I disagree. He and his cohorts disagreed about the would-be protestors' constitutional right to congregate and express protected free speech.

Had he/they personally known the targets in advance, your argument might have worked; one could then invoke an existing personal relationship between target and nutjob to avoid the general "terrorist" umbrella.

(I do agree that protesting at a funeral is poor in taste, but it is protected.)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-23 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atlasimpure.livejournal.com
KKK signs in Harlem, "Nascar Sucks" signs in Alabama, protesting at a Fundy-icon's funeral etc...deliberately provacative acts.

Now, if I was to shoot, assualt, or throw an explosive at someone doing these things would you call me a terrorist?

Solving a disagreement with violence is not automatically terror.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-24 04:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
It depends. Is your goal to send a message to the remaining members of the KKK that they aren't safe to practice their free speech, deplorable as it is? if so, then you are.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-24 04:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atlasimpure.livejournal.com
The purpose of violence in those sorts of situations is more one of "consequence".

A man spits in your face so you punch him. Cause and effect.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-24 04:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
I disagree. Or do you think that his goal was to silence only those protestors in his blast radius?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-24 04:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atlasimpure.livejournal.com
Yeah, he has no stated goal or apparent larger awareness of the effec tof his violence.

In fact, it seems like he just wanted a "moral" excuse to blow osmeone up.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 09:34 am