(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-20 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
#1: Yes, fervent belief in things for which there is no evidence is, in fact, generally considered a sign of insanity. Why should popularity of delusion matter?

#2: He pled not guilty by reason of insanity, originally. *He* was the one who originally said he was crazy. The fact that he changed his mind after everyone agreed with him is not the point.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-21 01:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ironphoenix.livejournal.com
Well, maybe he's not so much denying that he's crazy as trying for a procedural loophole. The obvious way out is for the judge &c to be crazy too, so the court with appropriate jurisdiction is obviously in Florida.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-21 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caerlas.livejournal.com
Umm, Weezy? I actually wasn't trying to start a debate or anything. I shot that comment of jokingly. Sorry, I should have included a ;) or something.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 12:26 pm