Sources to explain Vampire.
Nov. 21st, 2007 10:30 pmIf you wanted to give someone media sources (film, books, movies, etc) to explain Vampire[1], what would you give them?
I'd start with:
Les Miserables (specifically, Lloyd Webber as opposed to Hugo, and the character of Javert. Javert is a PERFECT vampire. Valjean, not so much, but workable.)
The Godfather (If you can find a character in that movie who isn't suitable as a vampire or a ghoul or a mortal minion, I will eat my cat. And she'd kick my ass.)
Amadeus
The Empire Trilogy by Raymond Feist and Janny Wurts ("Killing Lord Goto *is* a polite note.")
Discourses on Titus Livy by Niccolo Machiavelli
Othello, by William Shakespeare
I would avoid:
The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli, unless I was *certain* that the person I was giving it to would understand that The Prince is purest flattery, defining the perfect ruler as Cosimo de Medici for the sole purpose of getting the author employed by Cosimo de Medici. It's good advice, if you're Cosimo de Medici. Not so much, if you're not.
Every Splatbook published by White Wolf, unless I was *certain* that the reader could understand that all the splatbooks are written from a fallible, IC perspective.
How about you?
[1]: Masquerade or Requiem, doesn't matter. It's the same game, with different mechanics
I'd start with:
Les Miserables (specifically, Lloyd Webber as opposed to Hugo, and the character of Javert. Javert is a PERFECT vampire. Valjean, not so much, but workable.)
The Godfather (If you can find a character in that movie who isn't suitable as a vampire or a ghoul or a mortal minion, I will eat my cat. And she'd kick my ass.)
Amadeus
The Empire Trilogy by Raymond Feist and Janny Wurts ("Killing Lord Goto *is* a polite note.")
Discourses on Titus Livy by Niccolo Machiavelli
Othello, by William Shakespeare
I would avoid:
The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli, unless I was *certain* that the person I was giving it to would understand that The Prince is purest flattery, defining the perfect ruler as Cosimo de Medici for the sole purpose of getting the author employed by Cosimo de Medici. It's good advice, if you're Cosimo de Medici. Not so much, if you're not.
Every Splatbook published by White Wolf, unless I was *certain* that the reader could understand that all the splatbooks are written from a fallible, IC perspective.
How about you?
[1]: Masquerade or Requiem, doesn't matter. It's the same game, with different mechanics
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 03:45 am (UTC)The movie Brick wasn't bad; a little heavy on the noir, but the social setting did give you a very status-conscious, law-free society.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 03:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 03:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 04:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 05:01 am (UTC)The trick is, I want to know what I can give to modern players, people born post-Godfather, to best explain things.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 06:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 03:35 pm (UTC)(That said, some people *do* see the movie despite not having been born when it was in theatres, but it's not really common. I hadn't seen it until about three years ago, when John insisted.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 04:05 pm (UTC)There are people who haven't seen it. Or Apocalypse Now.
This is a very serious problem.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 06:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 07:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 11:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 03:50 pm (UTC)George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire.
Nobility, status, binding tradition, correct behaviour in the face of same, and *every single character* is just a bit of an outsider so hopefully players who have to counterpoint or contradict the society in some way[1] will get clues about how to do it without creating something totally inappropriate.
---
[1] I do this. I believe it's not inherently bad. I also believe that if it's done in a heavy-handed fashion, practically nothing will wreck the session and smash suspension of disbelief faster.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 04:06 pm (UTC)I think Erik would work as an inspiration for a Toreador or a Nospheratu, depending on which parts of the character you steal.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 04:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 04:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 11:42 pm (UTC)More like the Disworld phantom, but still an interesting characer.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 11:49 pm (UTC)He's not bad, as such things got.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 06:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-22 07:13 pm (UTC)I mean, it *makes sense* in their situation, with no authority and no Prince and no consequences - but that's the the way Vampire normally works.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 12:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 01:41 am (UTC)And Cy Tolliver was a Primogen at least, and George Hearst was at least a Princely contender.
That's not the point. Swearengen could never claim to be Absolute Monarch, but he made a great Prince. I just don't want to give that example to players who are too stupid to get vampire in the first place, because I think they'd learn all the wrong things from it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 02:02 am (UTC)Although, I am wondering why you'd want to associate with players that stupid in the first place. If they can't get the idea from the material that they're given by White Wolf that the game isn't about silver-plated katanas and laser powered electro fisitcuffs, I'm not sure there's much of anything that's going to help them.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 03:43 am (UTC)It's a side effect of LARPs. In the effort to produce enough players to make a LARP worthwhile, you necessarily have to let in players who you'd never want to game with normally, and you have to hope that they're not going to make your LARP irredeemably dumb in the process.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 04:11 am (UTC)Well, uh, not works works, but far preferable to having to teach people not to be dumbasses.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 04:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 05:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 01:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 04:27 am (UTC)Its the story of a Prince losing control of his city.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 07:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 08:11 pm (UTC)Meaning it's counterproductive to EXACTLY the target audience I'm aiming to improve.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 08:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 09:53 pm (UTC)There's a scene when Joe Friday - who is a respected cop - goes into a restaurant's restroom to arrest a prominent reverend because a witness identified him as being part of a local cult that kidnapped her. We as the audience know this is true. The reverend is at the restaurant where the arrest happens with the police captain and the police commissioner. As Friday leads the reverend out, he stops at the table where the other two are sitting. The reverend claims he has no idea what is going on. The commissioner completely believes the reverend, orders Friday to release him, and has the police captain strip Friday of his badge and gun. In this scene, truth doesn't matter as much as the reputation of the person saying it. It's such a weird example, but it works on so many levels.
It always irritates the shit out of me when someone with a half dozen status is ignored over some neonate just because this thing called "Aura Perception" exists, especially when that's actually said in black and white in the V:tM book.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-23 10:13 pm (UTC)