(no subject)
May. 1st, 2008 10:43 amLesbians sue Greek homosexual rights organisations to stop them from using the term "Lesbian".
"he issue boils down to who has the right to call themselves Lesbians.
Is it gay women, or the 100,000 people living on Greece's third biggest island - plus another 250,000 expatriates who originate from Lesbos?
The man spearheading the case, publisher Dimitris Lambrou, claims that international dominance of the word in its sexual context violates the human rights of the islanders, and disgraces them around the world. "
=========================
Of course, the *correct* response here is that, while there is confusion, there is no disgrace. In order for there to be disgrace, "Lesbian" would have to be a pejorative or negative term.
"he issue boils down to who has the right to call themselves Lesbians.
Is it gay women, or the 100,000 people living on Greece's third biggest island - plus another 250,000 expatriates who originate from Lesbos?
The man spearheading the case, publisher Dimitris Lambrou, claims that international dominance of the word in its sexual context violates the human rights of the islanders, and disgraces them around the world. "
=========================
Of course, the *correct* response here is that, while there is confusion, there is no disgrace. In order for there to be disgrace, "Lesbian" would have to be a pejorative or negative term.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:57 pm (UTC)> in order to improve their image by invoking the classical era.
The word is about three hundred years old; the word with its connotations of sexual orientation appears in the almighty OED by 1870.
I would dearly love some reference here which supports your contention that the use of the word "lesbianism" to the point where it was accepted by the OED was due to a concerted effort on the part of mid-eighteen-hundreds homosexual activists trying to make "teh girl-sex" seem classier.
While you are at it, please also address why these homosexual activists seeking to evoke the classical era were not satisfied by the adjective "Sapphic", which had appeared in print in English a hundred years earlier (~1770). Was that a different group of homosexual activists? Or were there two, who were just squabbling over the best etymological basis?
I await your references.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 06:55 pm (UTC)Given that Norway has had the same development in social mores as Britain, the US and presumably also Greece, I assumed that the linguistic development was also the same. Assumptions are always a risky business but have the benefit of being much faster than research. (Besides, the voice in my head would normally warn me if I was wrong.)
If the word "lesbian" has been commonly used in English for generations, it is obviously meaningless to seek to replace it. In particular, the organizations representing lesbians would have no power to do anything about it, nor any responsibility for the usage.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-02 12:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-02 06:41 am (UTC)