(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 06:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kierthos.livejournal.com
I guessed right on both.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 09:30 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (scohol)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Got `em both wrong. Broke my streak, too.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 11:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamshade.livejournal.com
Went half 'n half. They both sounded too Florida to me.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
I just posted about the second today. I gotta say, I don't care that much.

Not that what he did isn't gross. It is. He is not invited to my house. But passing a bill just for once guy is the same as building a better mousetrap. If his fetish isn't illegal, then why are we trying to outlaw it? What the hell does THAT accomplish! "You're a BAD man! Next time pick a fetish that's already illegal!"

With all the crap wring with this state, THIS is what we're wasting our time on ?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I got it from you, actually.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 06:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
I figured you would. I almost addressed it to you.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 09:20 pm (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (no free speech)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
At least passing a law against that isn't as bad as the UK "We don't like you protesting while we walk to work, so we're going to pass a law against you. Oh wait, we made the law wrong. We'll make another."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
I guessed, but I can't bring myself to read the stories.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fengi.livejournal.com
#1. Was there a contest to see how many offenses could be packed into one peversely self-centered act? I mean, why didn't she try to work in some mopery as well?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 09:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
I mean really. Why wasn't she at least dressed as a clown?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 07:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tsunami-ryuu.livejournal.com
I'm getting so good at this!

I don't know if that says more about the states or about me.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 08:16 pm (UTC)
ext_63755: '98 XJ8 (Default)
From: [identity profile] rgovrebo.livejournal.com
Wrong on both. Deviated preverts in both cases.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snap-wilson.livejournal.com
The urine guy looks disturbingly like Vork from The Guild.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scifantasy.livejournal.com
Got #1 right; got #2 wrong, but it disproves [livejournal.com profile] jsbowden, so I'm OK.

*smirk*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 09:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
Did they disappear in a poof of logic?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 08:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] booniecat.livejournal.com
I think this follow up article is even better: http://www.abcactionnews.com/content/news/weird/story/Bestiality-legal-in-Florida-for-now/Ibd_ZrzLJkGdIBTg_kqOmA.cspx

And here is why:

Rich’s [anti beatiality] proposal was amended to target only those who derived or helped others derive “sexual gratification” from an animal. The amendment specified that conventional dog-judging contests and animal-husbandry practices are permissible.

That last provision tripped up Miami Democratic Sen. Larcenia Bullard.

“People are taking these animals as their husbands? What’s husbandry?” she asked. Some senators stifled their laughter as Chairman Charlie Dean explained that husbandry it was the rearing and caring of animals.

Bullard didn’t get it.

“So that maybe have been the reason the lady was so upset about that monkey? Bullard asked, referring to a New York case where a woman’s suburban chimpanzee want mad and was shot.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wraith-mistress.livejournal.com
The pee guy is right around where I live. My friend who has two boys.... got the sexual predator flyer/ or some warning on her door along with most of the people in her area.

Then days later... she gets a text from her baby sitter who is at the pool with her boys.

"The Pee Guy is here. Do you want us to leave?"

M.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-27 09:50 pm (UTC)
frith: (peacock)
From: [personal profile] frith
Gross but funny. Now the two need to get together, move to India and follow sacred cows about while clutching styrofoam cups. Yum yum yum!

Dynamic duo

Date: 2009-03-27 10:03 pm (UTC)
frith: (Jambat)
From: [personal profile] frith
She 'knows' animals! He drinks urine! Together, THEY FIGHT CRIME!

Re: Dynamic duo

Date: 2009-03-27 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madfishmonger.livejournal.com
That would make a demented and potentially hilarious comic.

Re: Dynamic duo

Date: 2009-03-28 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ice-hesitant.livejournal.com
*awards [livejournal.com profile] ungulata the internet*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-28 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wherever.livejournal.com
Hey! I got it right on both. Awesome.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 04:04 am