theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
The physics! The physics are EATING MY BRAIN. Did not a single person involved in the writing of that movie know what a supernova, a black hole, an interplanetary distance, or a vacuum was?

(No, wait, they had no sound in space, twice. So they knew what a vacuum was SOME of the time. That makes it worse!)

It was a fun enough movie as long as you could turn off the educated part of your brain, completely. Seriously, so much of that film was just like Michael Bay's Batman script for sheer nonsense value. And once you accept that none of the things they're discussing are anything like the things they're discussing, there are a couple of clunky incidents of Explaining The Carburator for the slower children in the audience.

But, hey, fun story, very good special effects, the stupidity is limited to a complete inability to understand basic astrophysics and a little suspension of disbelief about the chain of command, and once you get past that it's not like there's an Idiot Plot running things. So, it's basically the best Star Trek movie currently possible.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-10 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
I think this is the best review of the Star Trek movie currently possible

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-10 11:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
yeah, the black hole thing bothered me (especially since it would have taken about a half a second to say something like "it created a singularity so powerful that it made a wormhole through space-time ... that would have been close enough to calm me down).

And it seemed to me that they only has sound in space when they had matter in space, but I'd have to see it again to be sure. But I agree, it was the best so far. I especially loved the nightmare when they dropped out of warp at vulcan. Good stuff, that.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-10 11:57 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (brock)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
The two biggest problems for me were:
1) "OK, we're going to sit here and wait for that dickwad Spock. I don't care if it takes 25 years! Who's with me?" "We all are, Captain!"
2) "Let's hang around and gloat! Not like the black hole is gonna catch up with us... oops."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 12:01 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (scohol)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Also, 'vacuum' has only one c.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 02:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
You know, I can totally see them plotting their revenge and planning it for 25 years. They're Romulans - they live stupidly long times, they loves them some revenge, and they *all* saw their homeworld destroyed.

Oh, and the captain is a dangerous psycho.

(Why did they put the comm/transporter jammer ON THE DRILL? That's stupid! And you can't drill into a planet's core, it will kind of collapse under it's own weight before you get out of the crust, let alone through the mantle! The hole just ain't gonna be there when your space laser stops firing! And you're using a BLACK HOLE GENERATOR! Toss it on the surface of the planet, who gives a crap?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 03:44 am (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (sherman)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
It's not that the jammer's on the drill, it's that the drill, when in operation, generates radiation that jams those signals. Which, hey, mining ship can't call for help when it's working? Big fat pirate target. And how did a mining ship get such fancy weaponry?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 03:57 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
It wasn't a comm/transporter jammer. The Jamming was a side effect of the drill. it was blocking them, but not because it was made to.

And I didn't really catch this on vulcan. Did they stop the drill when they sent the red matter in, or was it still going? Because if it's acting like a force field, I can see getting to the core. If not, then it's harder to get.

My big problem was the seeming lack of shields on these ships. they talked about them, but they didn't do anything as far as I can tell, and that's weird.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 12:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 01:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 05:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 05:39 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 09:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 09:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 11:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-12 12:33 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-12 02:14 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 08:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 09:04 pm (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-13 12:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-13 02:03 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Also: I don't get why *nobody fucking maneuvers*. And why the hell would you stick around and shoot at the ship that is *half in and half out of a *somehow planar* singularity? Beam the survivors off if they want to be beamed off, but nothing physical is getting away from that.

(Oh, and: "Why yes, I'll take an academy near-graduate on a midshipman's cruise without orders because he should have graduated and I think the boy's got the makings of a fine officer" and "Congratulations, middie, you haven't been on a real ship for more than two hours, you're second in command" are TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 05:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com
Heh.

(Oh, and: "Why yes, I'll take an academy near-graduate on a midshipman's cruise without orders because he should have graduated and I think the boy's got the makings of a fine officer" and "Congratulations, middie, you haven't been on a real ship for more than two hours, you're second in command" are TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS.)

I really really enjoyed the movie but that? Was the part I had the ABSOLUTE most trouble with. Cause the science (or rather the lack of science in many spots...) is pretty much like 'Okay it's Star Trek.. there will always be hand waving').

But figure there's a crew of like 450 - 500 people on the ship... these people are not mid-shipmen who are under suspension... this means there are 449 - 499 people who officially outrank Jim Kirk in the movie.

Yeah, yeah, gifted amateur blah blah blah..... but let's remember that experience trumps intellect, trumps instinct (and wasn't that pretty much what the whole end of Star Trek 2 was about)?

Advise someone with more experience? Sure.... Use him as part of the beam over team to help the plan take affect? Okaybe. Make him Captain.... well pretty much at any point of the movie including the happy ending? That's sorta crazy.

That's like taking the kid who just got kicked out of Driver's Ed and making him the pilot of Air Force One.

I liked alot of the movie, I'm intrigued as hell by where they go from here... but there were some glaring holes.

Which as you said makes it the best ST movie currently possible...
(and light years better than Nemesis, Insurrection, and Generations).

(Though anyone saying it's the best ever is apparently suffering from dementia).





(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 02:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 02:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 02:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 03:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-10 11:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sanityimpaired.livejournal.com
Harlan Ellison once said that science fiction was something that explored the boundaries of what science could do, while sci-fi was something that tried to provide entertainment with no pretense of science whatsoever. Star Trek was sci-fi from day one, so trying to hold it to science fiction standards at this point is just silly.

Coincidentally, Harlan Ellison is suing Paramount over the 25% of all proceeds from City on the Edge of Forever related merchandise he was contractually owed but never received.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 02:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
There's standard Star Trek nonsense (Warp drives, subspace communications, transporters, dilithium, reversing the polarity of the neutron flow, vulcan nerve pinches, etc) and then there's REAL WORLD nonsense (Supernovas don't work that way, a black hole won't "fix" a supernova because most supernovas *have black holes in the middle and that's why they went supernova*, black holes don't work that way, planet crusts and cores don't work that way, you'd be hard-pressed to get that good a look at a collapsing planet from it's own moon let alone from a different planet that is several minutes (at least) at maximum warp away).

Star Trek is normally barely tolerable because they keep their nonsense to the realm of pure fantasy.

This movie was *painful* every time it tried to explain everything - like "Hackers" and computers[1] or "Batman Begins" and what happens when you boil water.

[1]: I love that movie. Any time anyone asks me what's really possible for a skilled computer hacker, I tell them to rent and watch that movie. The short version is, if it happens in that movie, it's impossible.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 03:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thette.livejournal.com
Hey, reversing the polarity of the neutron flow is Doctor Who nonsense, not Star Trek nonsense.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kierthos.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 03:55 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thette.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 04:01 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 04:09 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] drjamez.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 04:18 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 03:59 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thette.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 04:00 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 04:04 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
Those are all worse because they would have taken no time at all to explain. I'd buy a planet near vulcan with some sort of atmospheric anomaly that makes things seem larger. Like a giant lens. It's dumb and unlikely and maybe also impossible, but I'd have bought it. I'd also have bought a nearby planet where the federation modified a part of the atmosphere for observation of vulcan.

I'd have bought the red matter entirely if they'd said that it created something other than a black hole. Call it a "class R wormhole" and I'll shut up. Call it a subspace anomaly and I'll be even happier. It's star trek. I'm already going to buy the babble.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 12:55 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 01:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 01:00 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 01:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 03:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kierthos.livejournal.com
Harlan Ellison, another victim of Hollywood math.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 03:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spartonian.livejournal.com
At least they made sure the away team member in red died.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 03:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Not just died, not just died first, but died first *stupidly* for *being stupid*.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-13 01:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com
The whole redshirt thing is also stupid. Bad guys should know to shoot the yellow shirts first.

Also: I had no idea the future meant that all the females wear short short short skirts.

While I'm here: why do vulcans and romulans have green blood, but pink skin?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-14 01:22 am (UTC)
jerril: A cartoon head with caucasian skin, brown hair, and glasses. (Default)
From: [personal profile] jerril
While I'm here: why do vulcans and romulans have green blood, but pink skin?


Saves on makeup. :D

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-14 01:27 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 04:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marlo.livejournal.com
I think I was just so sure it was going to suck that I was pleasantly surprised and delighted when it didn't. I think I've been fan-raped too much (Star Wars was my first fandom).

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 04:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
I have spent many years looking at Star Trek's "Science" as more like fantasy magic. Because, yes, everything you say is true, but it doesn't matter somehow anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 05:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lurkerwithout.livejournal.com
There's a Star Trek movie or tv series that manages correct high end science?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
No.

But the rose-eyed ten year old who hadn't yet realised that 99% of Star Trek was insipid remembers them spending most of their time inventing *nonsense science*, not nonsensifying *real science*.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 07:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zdallin.livejournal.com
That was about my take on it - as long as you took it as an "ooh, shiny" movie and didn't care for all the fuckups or the bastardisation of one of the most classic sci-fi series' in existence, it was pretty damn good :D

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com
It's not a bastardization, it's an alternate reality! :)

(Heh... I did find myself infinitely amused by them stopping to basically have all the characters get together and discuss why the guy two rows in front of me should shut up)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 02:51 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] chrisrw109.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-05-11 03:12 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 03:25 pm (UTC)

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 04:00 am