(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-17 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Also, why the "Seriously? Wow"?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-17 10:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I'm surprised you didn't get it immediately. You've always struck me as the kind of guy who always knows what the latest letter addition to "LGBTQW" is.

No offense intended, seriously. I was simply surprised you didn't get it, like if [livejournal.com profile] rimrunner had fumbled "fluffybunny" or [livejournal.com profile] james_nicoll had come up empty on "fanon".

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-18 11:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius1.livejournal.com
Ah, I see.

Your mild mockery of LGBT is, in my opinion, spot-on. The alphabet of sexual differences has always struck me as more unuseful than not, as LGB doesn't actually share a lot with T other than sympathy. Our political needs only slightly merge. John Aravosis had a very controversial Salon article about that issue several years ago, actually.

I know transsexuals exist, I feel for their plights about being recognized as the sex they wish to be recognized with, and I support political efforts on their part to get that recognition. Beyond that, I don't know much about it, because it doesn't interest me!

Big muscly gay bears getting to marry though? That interests me.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-17 10:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Or, really, if anyone of Our Mutual Acquantance hadn't known what "Sa'" prefixing a word meant.

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 04:40 am