theweaselking: (Default)
[personal profile] theweaselking
Governor of Texas goes jogging, saves puppy from coyote using laser-guided pistol.

I don't know why this is NEWS (oh, wait, Huffington Post: nothing but wall to wall crazy people. ANYTHING might be "news", there) but damn if it's not a hilarious image.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
You use a laser pointer to guide your shots. And my way is much funnier.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 08:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadath.livejournal.com
You aim your shots. You don't "guide" shit once it's out of the barrel. "Guided" has a specific meaning in ballistics, and until they start packing active control systems on bullets, pistol rounds don't come close to meeting it.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skiriki.livejournal.com
I think they had just made development on that front, making guided gun ammo reality... Of course, it was for a 50mm at this point, but...

Buggered if I can recall where I read that thing, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 09:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadath.livejournal.com
Guidance, or stabilization? I know they put fins on anti-tank rounds.

The cost would have to come down a lot to make it feasible for small arms. Putting a lot of money into something that blows up/fragments/is otherwise single-use only makes sense if it can take out something of the enemy's that's worth as much or more. Guided .50-cal rounds for snipers? I can see that. Guided...whatever an M-16 takes? (One of the NATO calibers; I don't remember.) Much less likely.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadath.livejournal.com
Ahahahaha DARPA. That's shorthand for "it'll never happen."

I'm not trying to be dismissive of you, personally, but DARPA RFPs almost never amount to anything.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skiriki.livejournal.com
Yes, I'm taking it with a grain of salt big enough to sate a hundred rabid moose in throes of salt-ecstasy. But, I'll just wait and see if they or someone else comes up with a working design. Really, people put time and effort into making other people dead the easiest possible way.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadath.livejournal.com
The question becomes whether it's just cheaper to send a few soldiers in to die. Plenty more where those came from!

Man, I'd love to just make a living on dumbass DARPA Phase 1 & 2 projects, but they stop awarding them if you consistently only do the early phases and never bid on the later, sure-to-fail phases.
Edited Date: 2010-04-28 09:26 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lederhosen.livejournal.com
I don't know if even DARPA were fool enough to throw money at it, but I wonder whatever happened to the DREAD (http://www.defensereview.com/world-exclusive-video-dread-weapon-system-devastating-jam-proof-and-silent/). I was surprised at how many people got suckered in by the arguments about how a recoilless gun doesn't break the laws of conservation of momentum :-(

(no subject)

Date: 2010-04-28 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
I could edit it so the headline just says "using LASERS".

Profile

theweaselking: (Default)theweaselking
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 01:23 am