Guess The State!

[theweaselking]

It is a felony to knowingly fuck someone while HIV+ without disclosing HIV status.

Guess the state: Sorry, the law doesn't apply unless it's a cis male putting his penis in a cis female's vagina. No other possible combinations are "sex".

[Poll #1762531]

Comments

[singingnettle.livejournal.com]

*Sigh.*

[scifantasy.livejournal.com]

"Everybody knows what sexual intercourse is," Bennett said. "To put it on paper is very difficult."

This is why you don't fucking define it, you leave it open to at least a little interpretation so that you don't look even more like idiots than normal.

But, oh, no, if we do that, "activist judges" will swoop in and do their fucking jobs.

[chaosrah.livejournal.com]

Wow...

[snakey.livejournal.com]

This is the same with rape law in many places.

[le-trombone.livejournal.com]

Why mention sex at all? Knowingly exposing someone to HIV is sufficient -- sex will cover 99% of the cases, but for all we know there was a transmission via a Hasbro Doink¹ toy. Why shouldn't that be covered if the transmitting individual knowingly put his or her partner in danger?

---
1. Not available in all areas. Call for availability.