Ohh, dude, you are in for it now. They are so going to explain how you were wrong on their blog...!
(Do I have bets on how there will be explanations about picking battles and only objecting to bad things and how people abusing a little old lady for the words other people taught her are totally not as important as kittens? Or something.)
Please, please tell me that you guys are the ones housebloatonstyx has banned in the hopes of never seeing their posts and comments again.
(Also, considering this is the same dude that tried to imply that the racist kids of Republicans were only being labeled racist because they were the kids of Republicans who had been labeled racist, I'm surprised this is the first go-around y'all have had.)
This isn't the first. His recent forays into commentary here include "racist children of Republicans are only labelled racist because their parents are racist, regardless of how racist they actually are", "you shouldn't paraphrase for emphasis while being clear that it's a paraphrase, because that might be confusing to the stupid", "the perception of Republicans as bigoted assholes is wrong even though the only exclusively-Republican positions are bigoted and assholey and also they emphasize those as the only reason to vote for them", "the Oxford Comma is the one true comma-delimiting element in a comma-delimited list"[1], "a cop shooting kittens with his sidearm in front of small children is just Job One for Real Po-Leese", and "Paula Deen's critics are a lynch mob of PC gone mad and WHITE people are the real victims of racism".
I still haven't banned him, because despite holding and expressing a great many ignorant, racist, and stupid opinions, he's been expressing them like something CLOSE TO an adult manner. See also the Tom Kratman[2] rule around these parts: "Being so obnoxious that you're disinvited to participate is a mark of *obnoxiousness*, and says nothing about the relative moral standing of banner and banned, or the correctness of what you were saying."
I'd link him to any number of the various LJ-killfiles, but houseboatonstyx is demonstrably fuckwitted. And I have no interest in seeing *if* I'm one of the people he's pre-emptively banned despite never having anything to say that might interest me, just to provide a comment on his journal.
[1]: Hey, he's not always wrong.
[2]: Hi Tom. Did I ping your Google rule again? My bad. Your Facebook is still banned, because you evidently can't play nice under your real name. If the sock puppet (of the kind you, historically, create whenever you're banned) is less of an asshole, it can stay.[3]
[3]: Hint: Your last sock here was "jim braiden". If that helps you find the login info, come and play. But I'm going to start by linking you back to the last time you gave up and saying "Hey, remember that time you gave up on defending the indefensible? Defend or admit you can't."
I have no idea! (Also, I'm not going to check, since AFAIK the only way to do that is commenting on their posts and seeing if it goes through. I have decided that this is not worth my time.)
...it's actually kind of nice, the level of not-caring about that particular ignoramus I am maintaining at this point. It might be due to tiredness, mind.
Well, as long as neither of you will check...it remains both true and not true at the same time, which is good enough for me. :D
Clearly, I usually don't care about him, as weaselking had to enumerate the past stupid he'd provided. Only, after the "kids of Republicans are unjustly labeled as racist the same way that kids of schizophrenics are unjustly labeled schizophrenic" post, I actually looked at his lj. His post about how discussing with your kids that the American Indians in Peter Pan are racist caricatures is equivalent to telling your kids not to clap for Tinkerbell really got under my skin. I hope to achieve your level of not-caring in the future, though!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2013-06-28 03:35 pm (UTC)(Do I have bets on how there will be explanations about picking battles and only objecting to bad things and how people abusing a little old lady for the words other people taught her are totally not as important as kittens? Or something.)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-06-28 06:33 pm (UTC)(Also, considering this is the same dude that tried to imply that the racist kids of Republicans were only being labeled racist because they were the kids of Republicans who had been labeled racist, I'm surprised this is the first go-around y'all have had.)
(no subject)
Date: 2013-06-28 09:30 pm (UTC)I still haven't banned him, because despite holding and expressing a great many ignorant, racist, and stupid opinions, he's been expressing them like something CLOSE TO an adult manner. See also the Tom Kratman[2] rule around these parts: "Being so obnoxious that you're disinvited to participate is a mark of *obnoxiousness*, and says nothing about the relative moral standing of banner and banned, or the correctness of what you were saying."
I'd link him to any number of the various LJ-killfiles, but
[1]: Hey, he's not always wrong.
[2]: Hi Tom. Did I ping your Google rule again? My bad. Your Facebook is still banned, because you evidently can't play nice under your real name. If the sock puppet (of the kind you, historically, create whenever you're banned) is less of an asshole, it can stay.[3]
[3]: Hint: Your last sock here was "jim braiden". If that helps you find the login info, come and play. But I'm going to start by linking you back to the last time you gave up and saying "Hey, remember that time you gave up on defending the indefensible? Defend or admit you can't."
(no subject)
Date: 2013-06-29 05:42 am (UTC)...it's actually kind of nice, the level of not-caring about that particular ignoramus I am maintaining at this point. It might be due to tiredness, mind.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-06-29 02:56 pm (UTC)Clearly, I usually don't care about him, as weaselking had to enumerate the past stupid he'd provided. Only, after the "kids of Republicans are unjustly labeled as racist the same way that kids of schizophrenics are unjustly labeled schizophrenic" post, I actually looked at his lj. His post about how discussing with your kids that the American Indians in Peter Pan are racist caricatures is equivalent to telling your kids not to clap for Tinkerbell really got under my skin. I hope to achieve your level of not-caring in the future, though!